From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66150C3ABC3 for ; Tue, 13 May 2025 21:40:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=OoJGXyW94J2XfBzKy8zCv7r/XXS+wVnkB3U9+mAKAk8=; b=yYtFRkf4l1e3EooRARxanrFuRf 5DwRT53pg1DBQeSOu8JBcw1UxW3n3TSWKsXADhZ8hkSsMINJhKo5swTm5Kb4iYjopRDe+yeO1DUPn kfz0Km7xhHC/FI48WQCUDfB/qkerOMjYQMtJl17aktjfHDI4kDVD2uYD1mG7xZrYXNR3KJJAFYJlf lWsXYX4jLGrJa3k5APnQRHWL0HJmFPFe/CcyO9zDbO63qLQyfsj9LilVkVaVQRaomRE1DLbwqYNL9 ZonWgHvDXAi93COiYXQ305bJMtpBxNLxCDnzOg1S5Hix83jrj2O8GI1ZACbSJ8xzHAq1fBUbAFJRc s6hlfxUw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uExMO-0000000DZa9-12fe; Tue, 13 May 2025 21:40:24 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uExMM-0000000DZZo-2EGl for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 13 May 2025 21:40:23 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA9B5C1024; Tue, 13 May 2025 21:38:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5BB97C4CEEB; Tue, 13 May 2025 21:40:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1747172419; bh=QfJ0N0PQ/BWcSw0Db0PnnO9MzicDFrplFsD4HUF2UWw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=KtaaJFv4gAh/lM3yT000IHrfjiew5Lg7QckUjmVYuvW2dqluxfCiTIaytjZsNkFbr YdHUXgIMgx6/XvUCNYykR16TC8SIvklnQgxTpetniENNFc/3G6JXBtora2Ke/1zjeW QiU5y9ozoruSccWdf0OL0mmTCUbw8kWWjdcE63hU6JOrwhNjKKdHuNlQIyhmhxbExV vmKXRfm3dwiCZiYanwFk0OOG+T4TLI++ggiy+SidtFVnNmvmzznv39m/ke7nN0E4ZN 20qQiA1IQYzuDGEhZaFm2nPlCIReyY0P6/OQEiWo/7K5kX75xp3xYGcwM+MfjrP0VE 0WA0i15zdowtg== Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 14:40:18 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Eric Biggers Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann , Marcelo Ricardo Leitner , Sagi Grimberg , Ard Biesheuvel Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/10] net: faster and simpler CRC32C computation Message-ID: <20250513144018.18770280@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20250511004110.145171-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> References: <20250511004110.145171-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250513_144022_638026_B4610E86 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 6.86 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-nvme" Errors-To: linux-nvme-bounces+linux-nvme=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sat, 10 May 2025 17:41:00 -0700 Eric Biggers wrote: > I'm proposing that this series be taken through net-next for 6.16, but > patch 9 could use an ack from the NVME maintainers. And patch 4 from RDMA. Please repost once those were collected and with the benchmarks you shared on Andrew's request. From networking PoV this looks good. -- pw-bot: defer