From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: Alan Adamson <alan.adamson@oracle.com>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, kch@nvidia.com,
kbusch@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, sagi@grimberg.me
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] nvme: all namespaces in a subsystem must adhere to a common atomic write size
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 07:35:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250514053546.GA24782@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9ae170fd-0f27-4da7-b475-61530b061c85@oracle.com>
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 10:45:33AM +0100, John Garry wrote:
>> + * Set subsystem atomic bs.
>> + */
>> + if (ns->ctrl->subsys->atomic_bs) {
>> + if (atomic_bs > ns->ctrl->subsys->atomic_bs) {
>
> I am not sure why use > and not !=
>
>> + pr_err_ratelimited(
>
> could dev_err() be used?
Yes and yes.
>
> "%s: Inconsistent Atomic Write Size,
>
> we could mention that this is the powerfail atomic size, and not "normal".
> But I suppose that we don't use "normal" values anywhere, so it could be
> assumed.
I'll keep it as-is, the message is already borderling too long as is.
>> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
>> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
>> @@ -410,6 +410,7 @@ struct nvme_ctrl {
>> enum nvme_ctrl_type cntrltype;
>> enum nvme_dctype dctype;
>> + u16 awupf;
>
> was it intentional to lose the " 0's based awupf value" comment?
I'll add it back.
Can I get a formal review tag after this?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-14 5:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-08 22:37 [PATCH v3 0/2] NVMe Atomic Write fixes Alan Adamson
2025-05-08 22:38 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] nvme: multipath: enable BLK_FEAT_ATOMIC_WRITES for multipathing Alan Adamson
2025-05-15 2:51 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-05-08 22:38 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] nvme: all namespaces in a subsystem must adhere to a common atomic write size Alan Adamson
2025-05-13 9:45 ` John Garry
2025-05-14 5:35 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-05-14 7:03 ` John Garry
2025-05-14 13:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-05-15 2:54 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-05-13 6:17 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] NVMe Atomic Write fixes Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250514053546.GA24782@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=alan.adamson@oracle.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox