From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F8DFC54E71 for ; Tue, 20 May 2025 15:26:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=Mva0IcLiubaL9SAQ03ptwyV0HxSLjqpLKCYwAHGj1n0=; b=waGRCzpn7JuRe8E6aJ0XpM4qdt hIKnbDH9gPrJwn0/qCPUj+lM8czuAisjXgfa90WvrmxrS0/sSWJJn6pFqNKNGtKKXBNh7dRIXdKIy Vh/5OjxQgY5fpC46mqTeGMEwFg85UVHD3oXBIgqWoQCTwSEWbiT3TXonnclcgd4vA2hNAvhx+EhJ5 JTBYxgFgHIQF0T/3xrzbmyu3M57Z1G6kbp9qISHl/XEt1YA5YmQp+xiwDteKNvDZADspOt9ZbhyDY /bipF6i+DIbdeRf2JRPoGC63lsNBheQN2DuB9bsq5xVfZ0+IVcC5w1uHEnMIhxtMOThpKYcQVvEsb wURHzgdg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uHOrk-0000000DKtY-07dh; Tue, 20 May 2025 15:26:52 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uHOjg-0000000DJ4h-1RFo for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 20 May 2025 15:18:34 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 039325C56C3; Tue, 20 May 2025 15:16:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A749C4CEEA; Tue, 20 May 2025 15:18:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1747754310; bh=gOcAH/YL5VciW2jCfOJM+RDZl3zKyoeTRxoKCucXQKc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=WIkvmAtt5TOeMvCDGBbPJgB4JjBBPqqSvNUUZs5g4513rRX5RxJkhlFPLNQkiiSyC kEEBnlMGbFy/UU2efYx4TS3uT1GkmLUB264f5DqVEAa1qu5AO0ZRlBcHoeOMvtBA6A dlCY/nTm3or20KEx0j9YfHik5x+PVGGk4VLjiEfUS3XV41Kx+8Mm28DQSJyEUF+vYJ OZB17ZWCrXlQ1JSY2UVx+PS5QsvjVLI4un1blQBMuTIzblz8vEuUEAWl+bbvgzxDeR +cE1X4cBIWWYk68/zYN0cY9FKSUESNiQcbeSYO/YpWyDDzCytghiSikW029Z+g86CS Ha7+ngUMOWpVw== Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 08:18:17 -0700 From: Eric Biggers To: Leon Romanovsky Cc: Bernard Metzler , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Daniel Borkmann , Marcelo Ricardo Leitner , Sagi Grimberg , Ard Biesheuvel Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 04/10] RDMA/siw: use skb_crc32c() instead of __skb_checksum() Message-ID: <20250520151817.GA1249@sol> References: <20250511004110.145171-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20250511004110.145171-5-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20250520131841.GH7435@unreal> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250520131841.GH7435@unreal> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250520_081832_430296_D9BD4AE9 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.72 ) X-BeenThere: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-nvme" Errors-To: linux-nvme-bounces+linux-nvme=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 04:18:41PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 09:04:04AM +0000, Bernard Metzler wrote: > > > > <...> > > > > > > > > Thanks Eric! > > Works fine. Correct checksum tested against siw and cxgb4 peers. > > > > Reviewed-by: Bernard Metzler > > This patch should go through RDMA repository, Please resend it. > > Thanks It depends on patches 1-2, and patches 6-7 depend on this one. So your proposal would require that we drag this out over 3 cycles (patches 1-3,5,8-10 in net in 6.16, patch 4 in RDMA in 6.17, patches 6-7 in net in 6.18). Can we please just take the whole series through net in 6.16? There aren't any conflicts. - Eric