From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FF7FC54E65 for ; Wed, 21 May 2025 10:41:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=lW3ReXr28mziMMAVZKQaxhHiyMhdGU1e8eWRwn5YoEo=; b=RH1YraJV5B49r77nep5OvDxGeW hmvQRw28Qe8nYAbZmehcP0XszoQd6zdX0/PRX/FalhGs9KqEHSDGKR3cQem+cud/96uSoDdku+z5E b1NCrzABwHL3YJiD1VFROr2JHIhs/FF0MqCge545U3clVvAkdV7BpGbj/DFgWWcXc/Gn3DW1ps47h gqeUuvVUOxpM30FDVAYjWwMC3h7JOqbet9VGFccwrS+GiK6gqsHHJ4SKBwS8dxUogQdH4kM0of+yR wGeQcq7extgZeYk4DYUKryVbjlh9RVMlHb/a2GpwjpoRhDiqaUDG3w56l3E/nRGMLQYWUr5GgYrNf bxovHr3Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uHgsl-0000000FWKE-24Eu; Wed, 21 May 2025 10:41:07 +0000 Received: from nyc.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:45d1:ec00::3]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uHgqH-0000000FW8q-22NR for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 21 May 2025 10:38:34 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by nyc.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 992F5A4EA1C; Wed, 21 May 2025 10:38:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BAD53C4CEE4; Wed, 21 May 2025 10:38:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1747823912; bh=aP22tRhItrix52YIZPiTVvPDKBs7jZe4Es3e+EjKrVs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=R+hXcp8pAKKzCs00FWgYrnC8O7yQAa8uVeh8w3VdkVwNpenLYkEnJri4VfxQGgUmX tPbGB9gAE3C8CQrTF2evARCW2FebIqh0P+lgHT/0Fab1flj+/psCo42ZMn8YD0yz0l wb0ZX64Io59BhUdN/RX3a3K1CRwCEgbG2oDjdQR2G5BeMFTQu9ikyRT231aTCKl3ZY VxHFef/Sf2BpBItLSxucJR4RTvN1MfErTfsiY2WVFQpbmfYyQr+CasunfF++egf9ex N/MC8zR+ATZXZPfbD5ynphUE6BnlsFTbwKudgIqlkY2+GhiMglr9mFXuP69RYKtfYp RVDtb53gCEOzg== Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 13:38:27 +0300 From: Leon Romanovsky To: Eric Biggers Cc: Bernard Metzler , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Daniel Borkmann , Marcelo Ricardo Leitner , Sagi Grimberg , Ard Biesheuvel Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 04/10] RDMA/siw: use skb_crc32c() instead of __skb_checksum() Message-ID: <20250521103827.GK7435@unreal> References: <20250511004110.145171-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20250511004110.145171-5-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20250520131841.GH7435@unreal> <20250520151817.GA1249@sol> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250520151817.GA1249@sol> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250521_033833_586249_6991B84F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.73 ) X-BeenThere: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-nvme" Errors-To: linux-nvme-bounces+linux-nvme=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 08:18:17AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 04:18:41PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 09:04:04AM +0000, Bernard Metzler wrote: > > > > > > > <...> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Eric! > > > Works fine. Correct checksum tested against siw and cxgb4 peers. > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Bernard Metzler > > > > This patch should go through RDMA repository, Please resend it. > > > > Thanks > > It depends on patches 1-2, and patches 6-7 depend on this one. So your proposal > would require that we drag this out over 3 cycles (patches 1-3,5,8-10 in net in > 6.16, patch 4 in RDMA in 6.17, patches 6-7 in net in 6.18). Can we please just > take the whole series through net in 6.16? There aren't any conflicts. No problem, if it helps. Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky