From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@kernel.org>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Kamaljit Singh <kamaljit.singh1@wdc.com>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Hannes Reinecke <hare@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] nvme-tcp: do not queue io_work on a full socket
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 08:45:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250528064535.135653-4-hare@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250528064535.135653-1-hare@kernel.org>
There really is no point in scheduling io_work from ->queue_rq()
if the socket is full; we'll be notified by the ->write_space()
callback once space on the socket becomes available.
Consequently we also need to remove the check for 'sk_stream_is_writeable()'
in the ->write_space() callback as we need to schedule io_work
to receive packets even if the sending side is blocked.
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@kernel.org>
---
drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
index 0e178115dc04..e4dd1620dc28 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
@@ -411,6 +411,9 @@ static inline void nvme_tcp_queue_request(struct nvme_tcp_request *req,
empty = llist_add(&req->lentry, &queue->req_list) &&
list_empty(&queue->send_list) && !queue->request;
+ if (!sk_stream_is_writeable(queue->sock->sk))
+ empty = false;
+
/*
* if we're the first on the send_list and we can try to send
* directly, otherwise queue io_work. Also, only do that if we
@@ -422,7 +425,8 @@ static inline void nvme_tcp_queue_request(struct nvme_tcp_request *req,
mutex_unlock(&queue->send_mutex);
}
- if (last && nvme_tcp_queue_has_pending(queue))
+ if (last && nvme_tcp_queue_has_pending(queue) &&
+ sk_stream_is_writeable(queue->sock->sk))
queue_work_on(queue->io_cpu, nvme_tcp_wq, &queue->io_work);
}
@@ -1074,7 +1078,7 @@ static void nvme_tcp_write_space(struct sock *sk)
read_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
queue = sk->sk_user_data;
- if (likely(queue && sk_stream_is_writeable(sk))) {
+ if (likely(queue)) {
clear_bit(SOCK_NOSPACE, &sk->sk_socket->flags);
queue_work_on(queue->io_cpu, nvme_tcp_wq, &queue->io_work);
}
--
2.35.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-28 6:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-28 6:45 [PATCHv4 0/3] nvme-tcp: fixup I/O stall on congested sockets Hannes Reinecke
2025-05-28 6:45 ` [PATCH 1/3] nvme-tcp: sanitize request list handling Hannes Reinecke
2025-05-29 12:34 ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-05-28 6:45 ` [PATCH 2/3] nvme-tcp: fix I/O stalls on congested sockets Hannes Reinecke
2025-05-29 12:34 ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-05-28 6:45 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2025-05-29 12:38 ` [PATCH 3/3] nvme-tcp: do not queue io_work on a full socket Sagi Grimberg
2025-05-30 6:42 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-06-04 8:04 ` [PATCHv4 0/3] nvme-tcp: fixup I/O stall on congested sockets Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250528064535.135653-4-hare@kernel.org \
--to=hare@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kamaljit.singh1@wdc.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox