From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>,
Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@samsung.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@samsung.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] block: add scatterlist-less DMA mapping helpers
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 13:31:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250616113141.GA21749@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2105172c-5540-40d0-9573-15001b745648@kernel.org>
On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 08:43:22AM +0200, Daniel Gomez wrote:
> >> This comment does not match with blk_rq_dma_map_iter_start(). It returns false
> >> and status is BLK_STS_INVAL.
> >
> > I went over you comment a few times and still don't understand it.
>
> The way I read the comment is that status is only valid when
> blk_rq_dma_map_iter_* returns false.
Yes.
> But blk_rq_dma_map_iter_start() can return false and an invalid status (in the
> default switch case).
The status field is valid. Your patch below leaves it uninitialized
instead, which leaves me even more confused than the previous comment.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-16 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-10 5:06 new DMA API conversion for nvme-pci Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 5:06 ` [PATCH 1/9] block: don't merge different kinds of P2P transfers in a single bio Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 12:44 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-10 15:37 ` Keith Busch
2025-06-11 3:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-11 16:26 ` Keith Busch
2025-06-11 16:39 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2025-06-11 16:41 ` Keith Busch
2025-06-11 19:41 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2025-06-11 20:00 ` Keith Busch
2025-06-12 4:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-12 6:24 ` Kanchan Joshi
2025-06-13 6:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-12 15:22 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2025-06-10 5:06 ` [PATCH 2/9] block: add scatterlist-less DMA mapping helpers Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 12:51 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-11 13:43 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-06-16 5:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-16 6:43 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-06-16 11:31 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-06-16 12:37 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-06-16 12:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-16 12:52 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-06-16 13:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-12 6:35 ` Kanchan Joshi
2025-06-13 6:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 5:06 ` [PATCH 3/9] nvme-pci: simplify nvme_pci_metadata_use_sgls Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 12:52 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-11 21:38 ` Keith Busch
2025-06-12 4:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 5:06 ` [PATCH 4/9] nvme-pci: refactor nvme_pci_use_sgls Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 13:10 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-11 13:43 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-06-12 5:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-11 20:50 ` Keith Busch
2025-06-12 5:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 5:06 ` [PATCH 5/9] nvme-pci: merge the simple PRP and SGL setup into a common helper Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 13:13 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-11 13:44 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-06-12 5:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-11 21:03 ` Keith Busch
2025-06-12 5:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 5:06 ` [PATCH 6/9] nvme-pci: remove superfluous arguments Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 13:15 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-11 21:05 ` Keith Busch
2025-06-10 5:06 ` [PATCH 7/9] nvme-pci: convert the data mapping blk_rq_dma_map Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 13:19 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-11 12:15 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-06-12 5:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-16 7:41 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-06-16 11:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-17 17:33 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-06-17 23:25 ` Keith Busch
2025-06-17 17:43 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-06-17 17:45 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-06-11 14:13 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-06-12 5:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-16 7:49 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-06-16 11:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 5:06 ` [PATCH 8/9] nvme-pci: replace NVME_MAX_KB_SZ with NVME_MAX_BYTE Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 13:20 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-11 14:00 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-06-10 5:06 ` [PATCH 9/9] nvme-pci: rework the build time assert for NVME_MAX_NR_DESCRIPTORS Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 13:21 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-11 13:51 ` Daniel Gomez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250616113141.GA21749@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=da.gomez@kernel.org \
--cc=joshi.k@samsung.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=nj.shetty@samsung.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).