From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] block-dma: properly take MMIO path
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 11:52:31 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251020085231.GM6199@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251017062519.GC402@lst.de>
On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 08:25:19AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 08:32:00AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> >
> > Make sure that CPU is not synced and IOMMU is configured to take
> > MMIO path by providing newly introduced DMA_ATTR_MMIO attribute.
>
> Please write a commit log that explains this. Where was DMA_ATTR_MMIO
> recently introduced? Why? What does this actually fix or improve?
What about this commit message?
Author: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon Oct 13 18:34:12 2025 +0300
block-dma: properly take MMIO path
In commit eadaa8b255f3 ("dma-mapping: introduce new DMA attribute to
indicate MMIO memory"), DMA_ATTR_MMIO attribute was added to describe
MMIO addresses, which requite to avoid any memory cache flushing, as
an outcome of the discussion pointed in Link tag below.
In case of PCI_P2PDMA_MAP_THRU_HOST_BRIDGE transfer, blk-mq-dm logic
treated this as regular page and relied on "struct page" DMA flow.
That flow performs CPU cache flushing, which shouldn't be done here,
and doesn't set IOMMU_MMIO flag in DMA-IOMMU case.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/f912c446-1ae9-4390-9c11-00dce7bf0fd3@arm.com/
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-20 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-17 5:31 [PATCH 0/3] block: Enable proper MMIO memory handling for P2P DMA Leon Romanovsky
2025-10-17 5:31 ` [PATCH 1/3] blk-mq-dma: migrate to dma_map_phys instead of map_page Leon Romanovsky
2025-10-17 6:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-19 14:40 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-10-17 5:31 ` [PATCH 2/3] nvme-pci: unmap MMIO pages with appropriate interface Leon Romanovsky
2025-10-17 6:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-20 7:53 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-10-17 5:32 ` [PATCH 3/3] block-dma: properly take MMIO path Leon Romanovsky
2025-10-17 6:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-20 8:52 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2025-10-20 12:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-20 14:53 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-10-20 8:56 ` Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251020085231.GM6199@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).