From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme-pci: always use blk_map_iter for metadata
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2025 09:25:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251026072551.GB12554@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aPebvnv3u6HWcqdX@kbusch-mbp>
On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 08:42:06AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 09:19:35AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 11:24:44AM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> > > From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
> > >
> > > The dma_map_bvec helper doesn't work for p2p data. Rather than special
> > > case it, just use the same mapping logic so that the driver doesn't need
> > > to consider memory types.
> >
> > We already consider the memory types for the data path, so treating the
> > metadasta path where p2p is even more unlikely sounds like the wrong
> > tradeoff.
>
> Maybe the data path should only use blk_dma_iter too. Is dma_map_bvec
> that much faster for the single vector case? I'm going to test both on
> real hardware and see if there's a difference in CPU utilization or
> latency.
We tried that path (remove special case for single segment), but for
very performance oriented case: direct mode without IOMMU, no p2p and
extremely powerful RAID (~94M IOPS), Jens and Kanchan saw performance
drop. On consumer grade HW (~2M IOPS), the performance change was not
noticed.
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-26 7:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-20 18:24 [PATCH] nvme-pci: always use blk_map_iter for metadata Keith Busch
2025-10-20 23:38 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-10-21 7:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-21 14:42 ` Keith Busch
2025-10-26 7:25 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2025-10-27 7:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-27 16:09 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251026072551.GB12554@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kbusch@meta.com \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox