linux-nvme.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] block-dma: properly take MMIO path
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 08:49:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251027074922.GA14543@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251027-block-with-mmio-v3-2-ac3370e1f7b7@nvidia.com>

> +	switch (iter.p2pdma.map) {
> +	case PCI_P2PDMA_MAP_BUS_ADDR:
> +		iod->flags |= IOD_DATA_P2P;
> +		break;
> +	case PCI_P2PDMA_MAP_THRU_HOST_BRIDGE:
> +		iod->flags |= IOD_DATA_MMIO;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		return BLK_STS_RESOURCE;

I almost wonder if we should just the pci_p2pdma_map_type values into
place.  But that's a future cleanup, I'd rather get this going now.

> +static inline bool blk_rq_dma_unmap(struct request *req, struct device *dma_dev,
> +		struct dma_iova_state *state, size_t mapped_len,
> +		enum pci_p2pdma_map_type map)
>  {
> -	if (is_p2p)
> +	if (map == PCI_P2PDMA_MAP_BUS_ADDR)
>  		return true;
>  
>  	if (dma_use_iova(state)) {
> +		unsigned int attrs = 0;
> +
> +		if (map == PCI_P2PDMA_MAP_THRU_HOST_BRIDGE)
> +			attrs |= DMA_ATTR_MMIO;
> +
>  		dma_iova_destroy(dma_dev, state, mapped_len, rq_dma_dir(req),
> -				 0);
> +				 attrs);

The only thing in req that is used now is the data directrion.  I'd be
almost tempted to just pass that and lift this to dma-mapping.h.

But I guess we could just do that in a follow on to not drag in
another subsystem.

Otherwise looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>


  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-27  7:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-27  7:30 [PATCH v3 0/2] block: Enable proper MMIO memory handling for P2P DMA Leon Romanovsky
2025-10-27  7:30 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] nvme-pci: migrate to dma_map_phys instead of map_page Leon Romanovsky
2025-10-27  7:30 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] block-dma: properly take MMIO path Leon Romanovsky
2025-10-27  7:49   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-10-27  7:57     ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-10-27  8:11       ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-10-27  8:16         ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-27  8:22           ` Leon Romanovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251027074922.GA14543@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).