From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com>,
kbusch@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, sagi@grimberg.me,
kch@nvidia.com, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] nvme: Allow reauth from sysfs
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 09:32:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251112083203.GA7838@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c7679208-c963-4fdd-a038-a91ccda0a075@suse.de>
On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 08:21:41AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>
> 'tls_configured_key' prints out the value of
> ctrl->opts->tls_key, ie the key passed in from the 'connect'
> string. Normally this value will be empty,
> as the 'connect' command will pick up the TLS key from
> the keyring automatically.
>
> 'tls_key' prints out the value of
> ctrl->tls_pskid, ie the value of the _negotiated_ key.
>
> So why is 'tls_configured_key' key the better option?
> Personally I think that 'tls_key' is more 'natural',
> as we want to replace the negotiated key, not the
> configured key ...
I've not even looked into what is better, but accepting anything
without validity checking tends to always bite us later.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-12 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-30 3:51 [PATCH 0/3] nvme: Support PSK reauthentication (REPLACETLSPSK) alistair23
2025-10-30 3:51 ` [PATCH 1/3] nvmet-tcp: Don't error if TLS is enabed on a reset alistair23
2025-10-31 10:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-30 3:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] nvmet-tcp: Don't free SQ on authentication success alistair23
2025-10-31 14:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-03 1:40 ` Alistair Francis
2025-10-30 3:51 ` [PATCH 3/3] nvme: Allow reauth from sysfs alistair23
2025-10-31 14:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-03 1:47 ` Alistair Francis
2025-11-03 2:05 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-03 2:24 ` Alistair Francis
2025-11-03 2:32 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-03 11:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-03 12:08 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-11-11 23:32 ` Alistair Francis
2025-11-12 7:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-12 7:21 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-11-12 8:32 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-11-13 4:01 ` Alistair Francis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251112083203.GA7838@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
--cc=alistair23@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox