public inbox for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Qinyun Tan <qinyuntan@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	Xunlei Pang <xlpang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Guixin Liu <kanie@linux.alibaba.com>,
	oliver.yang@linux.alibaba.com,
	Guanghui Feng <guanghuifeng@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1] nvme-pci: disable SR-IOV VFs on driver unbind
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 09:48:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260127084807.GA342@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260127073344.2489873-1-qinyuntan@linux.alibaba.com>

On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 03:33:44PM +0800, Qinyun Tan wrote:
> The NVMe PCI driver exports the sriov_configure callback via
> pci_sriov_configure_simple(), which allows userspace to enable SR-IOV
> VFs through sysfs. However, when the PF driver is unbound, the driver
> does not disable SR-IOV, leaving VFs orphaned in the system.

That sounds dangerous.

> According to Documentation/PCI/pci-iov-howto.rst, PCI drivers that
> support SR-IOV should call pci_disable_sriov() in their remove callback
> to properly clean up VFs before the driver is unloaded.

Bjorn and other PCI folks: is there any reason to not do this in
the PCI code and leave a landmine for the drivers?

> Fix this by disabling SR-IOV in nvme_remove(). If VFs are not assigned
> to a guest, disable SR-IOV. If VFs are still assigned, emit a warning
> since forcibly disabling would disrupt the guest.

Well, I think we have to distrupt it, at least for hot unplug.  This
sounds like we need some better handling in the core code as well.

> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> index 58f3097888a7..4f2dc13de48b 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> @@ -3666,6 +3666,15 @@ static void nvme_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  	nvme_stop_ctrl(&dev->ctrl);
>  	nvme_remove_namespaces(&dev->ctrl);
>  	nvme_dev_disable(dev, true);
> +
> +	if (pci_num_vf(pdev)) {
> +		if (pci_vfs_assigned(pdev))
> +			dev_warn(&pdev->dev,
> +				 "WARNING: Removing PF while VFs are assigned - VFs will not be deallocated!\n");
> +		else
> +			pci_disable_sriov(pdev);
> +	}
> +
>  	nvme_free_host_mem(dev);
>  	nvme_dev_remove_admin(dev);
>  	nvme_dbbuf_dma_free(dev);
> -- 
> 2.43.5
---end quoted text---


  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-27  8:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-27  7:33 [PATCH V1] nvme-pci: disable SR-IOV VFs on driver unbind Qinyun Tan
2026-01-27  8:48 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-01-27 14:31   ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-01-27 16:06     ` Keith Busch
2026-01-27 18:00       ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-01-27 23:09         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-01-27 23:43           ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-28  8:44           ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-01-30  4:53   ` qinyuntan
2026-02-06 22:28     ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260127084807.GA342@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=guanghuifeng@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=kanie@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.yang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=qinyuntan@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=xlpang@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox