From: Mohamed Khalfella <mkhalfella@purestorage.com>
To: Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@redhat.com>
Cc: kbusch@kernel.org, mheyne@amazon.de, emilne@redhat.com,
jmeneghi@redhat.com, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
dwagner@suse.de, mlombard@bsdbackstore.eu
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/5] nvme: Let the blocklayer set timeouts for requests
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 12:15:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260217201512.GG3435530-mkhalfella@purestorage.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260212120951.79738-2-mlombard@redhat.com>
On Thu 2026-02-12 13:09:47 +0100, Maurizio Lombardi wrote:
> From: "Heyne, Maximilian" <mheyne@amazon.de>
>
> When initializing an nvme request which is about to be send to the block
> layer, we do not need to initialize its timeout. If it's left
> uninitialized at 0 the block layer will use the request queue's timeout
> in blk_add_timer (via nvme_start_request which is called from
> nvme_*_queue_rq). These timeouts are setup to either NVME_IO_TIMEOUT or
> NVME_ADMIN_TIMEOUT when the request queues were created.
>
> Because the io_timeout of the IO queues can be modified via sysfs, the
> following situation can occur:
>
> 1) NVME_IO_TIMEOUT = 30 (default module parameter)
> 2) nvme1n1 is probed. IO queues default timeout is 30 s
> 3) manually change the IO timeout to 90 s
> echo 90000 > /sys/class/nvme/nvme1/nvme1n1/queue/io_timeout
> 4) Any call of __submit_sync_cmd on nvme1n1 to an IO queue will issue
> commands with the 30 s timeout instead of the wanted 90 s which might
> be more suitable for this device.
>
> Commit 470e900c8036 ("nvme: refactor nvme_alloc_request") silently
> changed the behavior for ioctl's already because it unconditionally
> overrides the request's timeout that was set in nvme_init_request. If it
> was unset by the user of the ioctl if will be overridden with 0 meaning
> the block layer will pick the request queue's IO timeout.
>
> Following up on that, this patch further improves the consistency of IO
> timeout usage. However, there are still uses of NVME_IO_TIMEOUT which
> could be inconsistent with what is set in the device's request_queue by
> the user.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maximilian Heyne <mheyne@amazon.de>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> index 7bf228df6001..b9315f0abf80 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> @@ -724,10 +724,8 @@ void nvme_init_request(struct request *req, struct nvme_command *cmd)
> struct nvme_ns *ns = req->q->disk->private_data;
>
> logging_enabled = ns->head->passthru_err_log_enabled;
> - req->timeout = NVME_IO_TIMEOUT;
> } else { /* no queuedata implies admin queue */
> logging_enabled = nr->ctrl->passthru_err_log_enabled;
> - req->timeout = NVME_ADMIN_TIMEOUT;
> }
>
> if (!logging_enabled)
> --
> 2.53.0
>
>
I wonder what was the impact of these lines given that req->timeout is
set to 0 by blk_mq_rq_ctx_init() when the request is allocated?
Reviewed-by: Mohamed Khalfella <mkhalfella@purestorage.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-17 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-12 12:09 [PATCH RFC 0/5] nvme: Refactor and expose per-controller timeout configuration Maurizio Lombardi
2026-02-12 12:09 ` [PATCH RFC 1/5] nvme: Let the blocklayer set timeouts for requests Maurizio Lombardi
2026-02-17 20:15 ` Mohamed Khalfella [this message]
2026-02-18 12:19 ` Heyne, Maximilian
2026-02-12 12:09 ` [PATCH RFC 2/5] nvme: add sysfs attribute to change admin timeout per nvme controller Maurizio Lombardi
2026-02-17 20:17 ` Mohamed Khalfella
2026-02-18 12:40 ` Heyne, Maximilian
2026-02-18 14:49 ` Maurizio Lombardi
2026-02-18 18:00 ` Mohamed Khalfella
2026-02-19 16:16 ` Maurizio Lombardi
2026-02-12 12:09 ` [PATCH RFC 3/5] nvme: pci: use admin queue timeout over NVME_ADMIN_TIMEOUT Maurizio Lombardi
2026-02-17 20:22 ` Mohamed Khalfella
2026-02-18 13:10 ` Heyne, Maximilian
2026-02-18 13:32 ` Maurizio Lombardi
2026-02-12 12:09 ` [PATCH RFC 4/5] nvme: add sysfs attribute to change IO timeout per nvme controller Maurizio Lombardi
2026-02-17 20:25 ` Mohamed Khalfella
2026-02-18 13:28 ` Maurizio Lombardi
2026-02-18 17:54 ` Mohamed Khalfella
2026-02-19 17:22 ` Maurizio Lombardi
2026-02-20 12:47 ` Maurizio Lombardi
2026-02-20 17:53 ` Mohamed Khalfella
2026-02-23 10:36 ` Maurizio Lombardi
2026-02-18 17:58 ` Mohamed Khalfella
2026-02-12 12:09 ` [PATCH RFC 5/5] nvme: use per controller timeout waits over depending on global default Maurizio Lombardi
2026-02-17 20:29 ` Mohamed Khalfella
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260217201512.GG3435530-mkhalfella@purestorage.com \
--to=mkhalfella@purestorage.com \
--cc=dwagner@suse.de \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=jmeneghi@redhat.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mheyne@amazon.de \
--cc=mlombard@bsdbackstore.eu \
--cc=mlombard@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox