public inbox for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mohamed Khalfella <mkhalfella@purestorage.com>
To: Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@arkamax.eu>
Cc: Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@redhat.com>,
	kbusch@kernel.org, mheyne@amazon.de, emilne@redhat.com,
	jmeneghi@redhat.com, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	dwagner@suse.de, mlombard@bsdbackstore.eu
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 4/5] nvme: add sysfs attribute to change IO timeout per nvme controller
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2026 09:54:52 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260218175452.GK2392949-mkhalfella@purestorage.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DGI4FR7YBCQ3.28N1YY210A3PA@arkamax.eu>

On Wed 2026-02-18 14:28:03 +0100, Maurizio Lombardi wrote:
> On Tue Feb 17, 2026 at 9:25 PM CET, Mohamed Khalfella wrote:
> >> @@ -4169,6 +4169,7 @@ static void nvme_alloc_ns(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, struct nvme_ns_info *info)
> >>  		mutex_unlock(&ctrl->namespaces_lock);
> >>  		goto out_unlink_ns;
> >>  	}
> >> +	blk_queue_rq_timeout(ns->queue, ctrl->io_timeout);
> >
> > Given that io tagset->timeout has been initialized to ctrl->io_timeout
> > Do we still need the line above?
> 
> 
> Yes, the line is necessary. While the tagset is initialized with
> ctrl->io_timeout, that happens only once during tagset allocation.
> 
> If the user later changes io_timeout via sysfs, ctrl->io_timeout is updated,
> but the tagset->timeout remains at the old default value. I deliberately
> do not update tagset->timeout in the sysfs handler because the tagset
> lifetime is tied to the controller state (e.g., it may be freed during a
> controller reset). Attempting to update the tagset from the sysfs path
> introduces a race condition where we might dereference a pointer to
> a tagset that is being destroyed.
> 
> Therefore, when a new namespace is allocated (nvme_alloc_ns), the block
> layer initializes the queue using the stale tagset->timeout. We must
> explicitly override that with the current ctrl->io_timeout to
> ensure the new namespace respects the runtime configuration.

Yeah. I got it now. Thanks for the explanation.
It would great if there is way to update admin and io tagsets timeout.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-18 17:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-12 12:09 [PATCH RFC 0/5] nvme: Refactor and expose per-controller timeout configuration Maurizio Lombardi
2026-02-12 12:09 ` [PATCH RFC 1/5] nvme: Let the blocklayer set timeouts for requests Maurizio Lombardi
2026-02-17 20:15   ` Mohamed Khalfella
2026-02-18 12:19     ` Heyne, Maximilian
2026-02-12 12:09 ` [PATCH RFC 2/5] nvme: add sysfs attribute to change admin timeout per nvme controller Maurizio Lombardi
2026-02-17 20:17   ` Mohamed Khalfella
2026-02-18 12:40   ` Heyne, Maximilian
2026-02-18 14:49     ` Maurizio Lombardi
2026-02-18 18:00   ` Mohamed Khalfella
2026-02-19 16:16     ` Maurizio Lombardi
2026-02-12 12:09 ` [PATCH RFC 3/5] nvme: pci: use admin queue timeout over NVME_ADMIN_TIMEOUT Maurizio Lombardi
2026-02-17 20:22   ` Mohamed Khalfella
2026-02-18 13:10   ` Heyne, Maximilian
2026-02-18 13:32     ` Maurizio Lombardi
2026-02-12 12:09 ` [PATCH RFC 4/5] nvme: add sysfs attribute to change IO timeout per nvme controller Maurizio Lombardi
2026-02-17 20:25   ` Mohamed Khalfella
2026-02-18 13:28     ` Maurizio Lombardi
2026-02-18 17:54       ` Mohamed Khalfella [this message]
2026-02-19 17:22         ` Maurizio Lombardi
2026-02-20 12:47           ` Maurizio Lombardi
2026-02-20 17:53             ` Mohamed Khalfella
2026-02-23 10:36               ` Maurizio Lombardi
2026-02-18 17:58   ` Mohamed Khalfella
2026-02-12 12:09 ` [PATCH RFC 5/5] nvme: use per controller timeout waits over depending on global default Maurizio Lombardi
2026-02-17 20:29   ` Mohamed Khalfella

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260218175452.GK2392949-mkhalfella@purestorage.com \
    --to=mkhalfella@purestorage.com \
    --cc=dwagner@suse.de \
    --cc=emilne@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmeneghi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mheyne@amazon.de \
    --cc=mlombard@arkamax.eu \
    --cc=mlombard@bsdbackstore.eu \
    --cc=mlombard@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox