From: Chris Leech <cleech@redhat.com>
To: yunje shin <yjshin0438@gmail.com>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ioerts@kookmin.ac.kr
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvmet: auth: validate dhchap id list lengths(KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds)
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 11:07:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260310-ladle-underuse-50f571ba519c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMX6_QG_Xx=1shB+76GKdMyB3-JW9nRiC+1vik=382FyFCT9cg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 02:52:36AM +0900, yunje shin wrote:
> Thanks for the review.
>
> Yes, I triggered the KASAN issue by injecting an invalid dhlen The
> reproduction steps are:
> 1. Connect to the NVMe/TCP target on port 4420 (ICReq + Fabrics CONNECT).
> 2. Send AUTH_SEND with a crafted NEGOTIATE payload where dhlen=200. 3.
> The kernel target code in nvmet_auth_negotiate() then iterates
>
> for (i = 0; i < data->auth_protocol[0].dhchap.dhlen; i++) {
> int tmp_dhgid = data->auth_protocol[0].dhchap.idlist[i + 30];
>
> With dhlen=200, this reads idlist[30..229], but idlist[] is only 60
> bytes (indices 0..59). The accesses at indices 60 and beyond read past
> the kmalloc'd slab object into adjacent slab memory, which KASAN
> catches as a slab-out-of-bounds read.
Thank you, I appreciate understanding how this was triggered.
> While the standard Linux NVMe host driver does use hardcoded halen=3
> and dhlen=6, the NVMe target is network-facing and must validate all
> fields from the wire. A malicious or non-standard host can send
> arbitrary values. The same applies to halen — if halen > 30, the
> first loop also reads out of bounds.
Yes, this code absolutly should validate halen and dhlen bounds.
> Regarding idlist_half — yes, idlist is currently a fixed 60-byte array
> and the DH offset is always 30. I derived it from sizeof(idlist)
> rather than hardcoding 30 so that the bounds check and the DH offset
> stay consistent with the array definition. If the struct ever changes,
> the validation adapts automatically instead of silently going stale.
The 60-byte idlist (and 30:30 split) are part of the NVMe specification.
It's the maximum amount of space while keeping to a 64-byte struct.
I'd rather see this made clearer with a define for the limit, but not
adding code that appears to calculate it at runtime.
Thanks,
- Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-10 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-11 6:58 [PATCH] nvmet: auth: validate dhchap id list lengths(KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds) YunJe Shin
2026-02-12 1:49 ` yunje shin
2026-02-18 4:04 ` yunje shin
2026-03-08 15:09 ` yunje shin
2026-03-09 18:04 ` Chris Leech
2026-03-10 17:48 ` yunje shin
2026-03-10 17:52 ` yunje shin
2026-03-10 18:07 ` Chris Leech [this message]
2026-03-10 19:06 ` yunje shin
2026-03-10 20:34 ` Chris Leech
2026-03-12 7:01 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-03-13 5:24 ` [PATCH v2] nvmet: auth: validate dhchap id list lengths YunJe Shin
2026-03-13 15:30 ` Chris Leech
2026-03-17 14:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-17 16:55 ` yunje shin
2026-03-20 7:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-20 8:13 ` yunje shin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260310-ladle-underuse-50f571ba519c@redhat.com \
--to=cleech@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=ioerts@kookmin.ac.kr \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=yjshin0438@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox