public inbox for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Leech <cleech@redhat.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: alistair23@gmail.com, hch@lst.de, sagi@grimberg.me,
	kch@nvidia.com,  kbusch@kernel.org,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 yi.zhang@redhat.com, mlombard@arkamax.eu,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,  shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com,
	Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvmet-tcp: Ensure old keys are freed before replacing new ones
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 08:27:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260416-landlord-encounter-c93f2733de5f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <959f800d-b92e-406e-a174-680fb09c884e@suse.de>

On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 08:16:14AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 4/16/26 01:02, alistair23@gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
> > 
> > Previously after the host sends a REPLACETLSPSK we freed the TLS keys as
> > part of calling nvmet_auth_sq_free() on success. A recent change ensured
> > we don't free the keys, allowing REPLACETLSPSK to work.
> > 
> > But that fix results in a kernel memory leak when running
> > 
> > ```
> > nvme_trtype=loop ./check nvme/041 nvme/042 nvme/043 nvme/044 nvme/045 nvme/051 nvme/052
> > echo scan > /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
> > cat /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
> > ```
> > 
> > We can't free the keys on a successful DHCHAP operation, otherwise the
> > next REPLACETLSPSK will fail, so instead let's free them before we
> > replace them as part of nvmet_auth_challenge().
> > 
> > This ensures that REPLACETLSPSK works, while also avoiding any memory
> > leaks.
> > 
> > Fixes: 2e6eb6b277f59 ("nvmet-tcp: Don't free SQ on authentication success")
> > Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/nvme/target/fabrics-cmd-auth.c | 7 +++++++
> >   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/fabrics-cmd-auth.c b/drivers/nvme/target/fabrics-cmd-auth.c
> > index b9ab80c7a6941..58185184478a4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/nvme/target/fabrics-cmd-auth.c
> > +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/fabrics-cmd-auth.c
> > @@ -412,6 +412,13 @@ static int nvmet_auth_challenge(struct nvmet_req *req, void *d, int al)
> >   	int hash_len = nvme_auth_hmac_hash_len(ctrl->shash_id);
> >   	int data_size = sizeof(*d) + hash_len;
> > +	/*
> > +	 * If replacing the keys then we have previous successful keys
> > +	 * that might be leaked, so we need to free them here.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (req->sq->dhchap_c1)
> > +		nvmet_auth_sq_free(req->sq);
> > +
> >   	if (ctrl->dh_tfm)
> >   		data_size += ctrl->dh_keysize;
> >   	if (al < data_size) {
> I am not sure.
> The authentication variables should be freed as soon as the authentication
> completes; the session key is ephemeral and
> should not be stored longer than necessary and will _never_
> be used again once authentication completes.
> The TLS key, OTOH, is used throughout the session and needs
> to be present while the session is active
> As such, both sets have vastly different lifetimes, and
> I would argue that this
> 
> void nvmet_auth_sq_free(struct nvmet_sq *sq)
> {
> 	cancel_delayed_work(&sq->auth_expired_work);
> #ifdef CONFIG_NVME_TARGET_TCP_TLS
> 	sq->tls_key = NULL;
> #endif
> 	kfree(sq->dhchap_c1);
> 	sq->dhchap_c1 = NULL;
> 
> is actually wrong as we should not modify 'tls_key' here.

I agree with Hannes, and was just about to respond with the same
feedback.  I think the freeing of the auth temporaries needs to be
returned to fix the memleak, and the real problem is the setting of
tls_key to NULL.  That doesn't seem like the right lifetime for tls_key,
and it looks to be a reference count leak as well.

Is the presence of sq->tls_key the best check to see if the socket is
currently in a kTLS mode?  (it might be, I'm not as up on the target
code)

- Chris



  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-16 15:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-15 23:02 [PATCH] nvmet-tcp: Ensure old keys are freed before replacing new ones alistair23
2026-04-16  5:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-16  6:16 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-04-16 15:27   ` Chris Leech [this message]
2026-04-17  0:49     ` Alistair Francis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260416-landlord-encounter-c93f2733de5f@redhat.com \
    --to=cleech@redhat.com \
    --cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
    --cc=alistair23@gmail.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=kch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mlombard@arkamax.eu \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox