From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>,
Roy Shterman <roys@lightbitslabs.com>,
Solganik Alexander <sashas@lightbitslabs.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvmet-tcp: fix page fragment cache leak in error path
Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 09:12:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260526071201.GA25581@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <39d57858464bb3933160d6f7583640db086fbb80.1779702494.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
On Mon, May 25, 2026 at 05:50:19PM +0800, Geliang Tang wrote:
> From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
>
> In nvmet_tcp_alloc_queue(), when a connection is closed during the
> allocation process (e.g., nvmet_tcp_set_queue_sock() returns -ENOTCONN),
> the error handling jumps to out_free_queue without draining the page
> fragment cache.
nvmet_tcp_set_queue_sock jumps to out_destroy_sq.
> Although nvmet_tcp_free_cmd() is called in some error paths to release
> individual page fragments, the underlying page cache reference held by
> queue->pf_cache is never released. This results in a page leak each time
> a connection fails during allocation, which could lead to memory
> exhaustion over time if connections are repeatedly opened and closed.
>
> Fix this by calling page_frag_cache_drain() before freeing the queue
> structure in the out_free_queue label.
The first allocation using pf_cache is the call to nvmet_tcp_alloc_cmd
after ida_alloc. So afaik this drain should at the out_ida_remove
label. And given how obscure this is, maybe a comment would not
hurt either?
Otherwise this looks good.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-26 7:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-25 9:50 [PATCH] nvmet-tcp: fix page fragment cache leak in error path Geliang Tang
2026-05-26 7:12 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260526071201.GA25581@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=geliang@kernel.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=roys@lightbitslabs.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=sashas@lightbitslabs.com \
--cc=tanggeliang@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox