Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Chao Shi <coshi036@gmail.com>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Sungwoo Kim <iam@sung-woo.kim>, Dave Tian <daveti@purdue.edu>,
	Weidong Zhu <weizhu@fiu.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: reject completions for requests that are not in flight
Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 16:19:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260527141909.GA13578@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260522153034.2168862-1-coshi036@gmail.com>

On Fri, May 22, 2026 at 11:30:34AM -0400, Chao Shi wrote:
> nvme_find_rq() resolves a device-supplied command id to a request with
> blk_mq_tag_to_rq(), which returns whatever request last used that tag -
> possibly one that is no longer in flight (freed, or never dispatched and
> thus with a NULL rq->mq_hctx).  Commit e7006de6c238 ("nvme: code
> command_id with a genctr for use-after-free validation") guards against
> this, but its generation counter is only 4 bits wide and can be matched
> by a malfunctioning or malicious device replaying command ids.  The
> driver then completes a request that is not outstanding, dereferencing a
> NULL rq->mq_hctx or double-completing a command:

I don't think an intentionally malicious device is part of the threat
model here.  This was added to protect against buggy devices.

> +	/*
> +	 * blk_mq_tag_to_rq() returns whatever request last used this tag, which
> +	 * may no longer be in flight if the device reports a bogus command id.
> +	 * Completing it would deref a NULL rq->mq_hctx or double-complete a
> +	 * command; the 4-bit genctr below only narrows the window.
> +	 */
> +	if (unlikely(blk_mq_rq_state(rq) != MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT)) {
> +		dev_err(nvme_req(rq)->ctrl->device,
> +			"completion for request %#x not in flight\n", tag);
> +		return NULL;
> +	}

Although this check looks cheap enough that it should not hurt to add
it.  So I think this should be ok, but maybe respin with your planned
commit message update.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-27 14:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-22 15:30 [PATCH] nvme: reject completions for requests that are not in flight Chao Shi
2026-05-25 20:27 ` Chao S
2026-05-27 14:19 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-05-27 15:02   ` Jens Axboe
2026-05-27 15:00 ` Keith Busch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260527141909.GA13578@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=coshi036@gmail.com \
    --cc=daveti@purdue.edu \
    --cc=iam@sung-woo.kim \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=weizhu@fiu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox