From: Rihyeon Kim <rihyeon8648@gmail.com>
To: cassel@kernel.org
Cc: kbusch@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, sagi@grimberg.me, axboe@kernel.dk,
justin.tee@broadcom.com, nareshgottumukkala83@gmail.com,
paul.ely@broadcom.com, kch@nvidia.com,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme-fc: fix double free of fabrics options when nvme_add_ctrl() fails
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 19:55:10 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260812105510.53766-1-rihyeon8648@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ansfMnm1WntoQRi_@ryzen>
Hello,
Thanks for the suggestion.
> Wouldn't a nicer fix be to change nvme_fc_ctrl_free() to look more like
> nvme_tcp_ctrl_free(), i.e. something like:
>
> + if (list_empty(&ctrl->ctrl_list))
> + goto free_ctrl;
I am not sure whether that would work, and I may well be missing
something. From what I could tell, nvme_tcp_create_ctrl() does its
list_add_tail() last, while nvme_fc_init_ctrl() does it before the
nvme_change_ctrl_state() and queue_delayed_work() checks, so on those two
failure paths the controller is already on the list and opts would end up
freed twice again. The early goto would also skip the ida_free(),
put_device() and nvme_fc_rport_put() for what nvme_fc_alloc_ctrl() takes
before the list_add.
I am not familiar with this driver either, so please correct me if I have
misread it.
Keith suggested moving the existing clear from fail_ctrl: down to
out_put_ctrl: instead, so I will send that as v2.
Thanks,
Rihyeon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-12 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-11 2:06 [syzbot] [nvme?] KASAN: slab-use-after-free Read in nvmf_free_options syzbot
2026-08-11 12:53 ` [PATCH] nvme-fc: fix double free of fabrics options when nvme_add_ctrl() fails Rihyeon Kim
2026-08-11 13:10 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-08-12 10:55 ` Rihyeon Kim [this message]
2026-08-12 10:59 ` Rihyeon Kim
2026-08-12 14:26 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-08-12 14:30 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-08-11 15:29 ` Keith Busch
2026-08-12 10:55 ` Rihyeon Kim
2026-08-12 10:59 ` Rihyeon Kim
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-08-14 14:38 Niklas Cassel
2026-08-14 16:30 ` Keith Busch
2026-08-17 6:18 ` Rihyeon Kim
2026-08-17 15:10 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-08-19 15:28 ` Keith Busch
2026-08-19 18:32 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-08-20 15:23 ` Keith Busch
2026-08-21 13:21 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-08-21 14:18 ` Keith Busch
2026-08-21 14:35 ` Keith Busch
2026-08-21 14:56 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-08-25 17:45 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260812105510.53766-1-rihyeon8648@gmail.com \
--to=rihyeon8648@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=justin.tee@broadcom.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=nareshgottumukkala83@gmail.com \
--cc=paul.ely@broadcom.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox