From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Shivam Kumar <kumar.shivam43666@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Ibrahim Hashimov <security@auditcode.ai>
Subject: Re: Prior report for the nvmet-tcp unbounded SGL length fix in 7.3
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 18:01:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026082412-matchbook-perennial-03af@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+ysrSKO9ufMWQ=s_xM_uh1OhKmEb8v0tOwYH+g2vtxeWqW8DQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Aug 24, 2026 at 11:42:50AM -0400, Shivam Kumar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I originally reported this issue to security@kernel.org on 2026-03-17
> (Cc Sagi), Message-ID:
> <CA+ysrSJUFi8cHzU8g9Nrbbkcuo0F7vh8CMn3ht15gSk3BbK45A@mail.gmail.com>
> and posted the first patch for it in this thread,
> "[PATCH] nvmet-tcp: bound sgl->length check in nvmet_tcp_map_data()"
> (2026-03-19).
>
> Commit 4a3f002 ("nvmet-tcp: bound SGL data length before allocating
> command buffers"), merged for 7.3, adds the same NVMET_TCP_MAXH2CDATA
> bound with the same status code.
>
> These things happen independently, and I'm glad the issue is fixed.
> Would it be possible to get some acknowledgement for the original
> report?
"acknowledgment" in what way? If the patch is merged, what can we do
here?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-24 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-24 15:42 Prior report for the nvmet-tcp unbounded SGL length fix in 7.3 Shivam Kumar
2026-08-24 15:50 ` Shivam Kumar
2026-08-24 16:01 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2026-08-24 16:07 ` Shivam Kumar
2026-08-24 16:54 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-08-24 18:18 ` Shivam Kumar
2026-08-25 8:13 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-08-24 16:31 ` Maurizio Lombardi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026082412-matchbook-perennial-03af@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kumar.shivam43666@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=security@auditcode.ai \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox