From: Martin Belanger via B4 Relay <devnull+martin.nvme.dev.gmail.com@kernel.org>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@kernel.org>, Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>,
kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>,
Martin Belanger <martin.belanger@dell.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC net-next 4/5] tls: send a KeyUpdate at the record limit and on request
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2026 20:36:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261025-keyupdate-rfc-v1-4-60b7756eccbd@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261025-keyupdate-rfc-v1-0-60b7756eccbd@gmail.com>
From: Martin Belanger <martin.belanger@dell.com>
RFC 9846 section 5.5 requires a key update before the key reaches its
usage limit, 2^24.5 full-size records for AES-GCM. The limit counts
records, and only the record layer knows where records start and end.
Section 4.7.3 also requires a reply to a KeyUpdate with
update_requested, sent before the next Application Data record. Both
need a KeyUpdate at an exact position in the record stream.
For a socket with a registered TX secret, send a KeyUpdate before the
next record when the key has protected 2^24 records, as GnuTLS does,
or when the peer asked for one. ChaCha20-Poly1305 has no record limit.
The KeyUpdate is sent as a handshake record, which closes the open data
record first. Pending encryptions are then completed, and only then is
the next key installed.
Add TLS_TX_KEY_UPDATE to send a KeyUpdate now, optionally asking the
peer to update too. It can only bring a KeyUpdate forward: the record
limit is enforced either way. Following section 4.7.3, a new request
to the peer waits for the answer to the previous one, and no more than
2^48-1 epochs are used.
Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Martin Belanger <martin.belanger@dell.com>
---
Documentation/networking/tls.rst | 17 +++++
include/net/tls.h | 5 +-
include/uapi/linux/tls.h | 1 +
net/tls/tls.h | 1 +
net/tls/tls_keyupdate.c | 5 ++
net/tls/tls_main.c | 32 +++++++++
net/tls/tls_sw.c | 149 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
7 files changed, 208 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/tls.rst b/Documentation/networking/tls.rst
index 2e011bd1ce4a..69752a6d67df 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/tls.rst
+++ b/Documentation/networking/tls.rst
@@ -326,6 +326,23 @@ direction is then left to the application again.
The secrets cannot be read back.
+With a registered TX secret, the kernel sends a KeyUpdate before the key
+reaches its record limit (RFC 9846, section 5.5): after 2^24 records, except
+for ChaCha20-Poly1305, which has no limit. It also sends one before the next
+record when a received KeyUpdate asks for it. With a registered RX secret,
+the kernel processes a received KeyUpdate and does not pass the record to
+the application. A peer that sends more than 8 KeyUpdates in one second ends
+the connection.
+
+TLS_TX_KEY_UPDATE
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+TLS 1.3 only. Send a KeyUpdate now and install the next TX key. Needs a
+registered TX secret. The value is an ``int``: 0 to send a KeyUpdate, 1 to
+also ask the peer to update its key. Asking the peer needs a registered RX
+secret, and fails with ``EBUSY`` until the peer has answered the previous
+request.
+
Statistics
==========
diff --git a/include/net/tls.h b/include/net/tls.h
index a5bc28a7d1f5..d3123b17030c 100644
--- a/include/net/tls.h
+++ b/include/net/tls.h
@@ -282,9 +282,12 @@ struct tls_context {
union tls_crypto_context crypto_send;
union tls_crypto_context crypto_recv;
- /* Registered for KeyUpdate, protected by the socket lock */
+ /* KeyUpdate state, protected by the socket lock */
struct tls_traffic_secret tx_secret;
struct tls_traffic_secret rx_secret;
+ u64 tx_key_updates; /* KeyUpdates sent */
+ bool tx_key_update_reply; /* peer set update_requested */
+ bool tx_key_update_asked; /* we set it, no answer yet */
struct list_head list;
refcount_t refcount;
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/tls.h b/include/uapi/linux/tls.h
index d1b136ecea96..c85408cb6ce7 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/tls.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/tls.h
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
#define TLS_TX_MAX_PAYLOAD_LEN 5 /* Maximum plaintext size */
#define TLS_TX_TRAFFIC_SECRET 6 /* TLS 1.3 TX traffic secret */
#define TLS_RX_TRAFFIC_SECRET 7 /* TLS 1.3 RX traffic secret */
+#define TLS_TX_KEY_UPDATE 8 /* Send a TLS 1.3 KeyUpdate now */
/* Supported versions */
#define TLS_VERSION_MINOR(ver) ((ver) & 0xFF)
diff --git a/net/tls/tls.h b/net/tls/tls.h
index 63ece8074985..d12c9278c814 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls.h
+++ b/net/tls/tls.h
@@ -151,6 +151,7 @@ int tls_hkdf_expand_label(const u8 *secret, size_t secret_len,
const char *label, u8 *out, size_t out_len);
int tls_keyupdate_rekey(struct sock *sk, int tx);
int tls_keyupdate_rx(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
+int tls_sw_key_update(struct sock *sk, int request);
int tls_set_sw_offload(struct sock *sk, int tx,
struct tls_crypto_info *new_crypto_info);
void tls_update_rx_zc_capable(struct tls_context *tls_ctx);
diff --git a/net/tls/tls_keyupdate.c b/net/tls/tls_keyupdate.c
index 543bf57599c7..851d5b54b336 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_keyupdate.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_keyupdate.c
@@ -146,5 +146,10 @@ int tls_keyupdate_rx(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
}
TLS_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TLSRXREKEYOK);
+ /* Any KeyUpdate from the peer answers our update_requested */
+ ctx->tx_key_update_asked = false;
+ if (msg[4] == TLS_KEY_UPDATE_REQUESTED)
+ ctx->tx_key_update_reply = true;
+
return 0;
}
diff --git a/net/tls/tls_main.c b/net/tls/tls_main.c
index 1c6e993ec012..0bce7df279a5 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_main.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_main.c
@@ -934,6 +934,35 @@ static int do_tls_setsockopt_secret(struct sock *sk, sockptr_t optval,
return 0;
}
+static int do_tls_setsockopt_key_update(struct sock *sk, sockptr_t optval,
+ unsigned int optlen)
+{
+ struct tls_context *ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
+ int value, rc;
+
+ if (sockptr_is_null(optval) || optlen != sizeof(value))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (copy_from_sockptr(&value, optval, sizeof(value)))
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ if (value != 0 && value != 1)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ rc = mutex_lock_interruptible(&ctx->tx_lock);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+ lock_sock(sk);
+ if (ctx->tx_conf == TLS_SW)
+ rc = tls_sw_key_update(sk, value);
+ else
+ rc = -EINVAL;
+ release_sock(sk);
+ mutex_unlock(&ctx->tx_lock);
+
+ return rc;
+}
+
static int do_tls_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int optname, sockptr_t optval,
unsigned int optlen)
{
@@ -967,6 +996,9 @@ static int do_tls_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int optname, sockptr_t optval,
optname == TLS_TX_TRAFFIC_SECRET);
release_sock(sk);
break;
+ case TLS_TX_KEY_UPDATE:
+ rc = do_tls_setsockopt_key_update(sk, optval, optlen);
+ break;
default:
rc = -ENOPROTOOPT;
break;
diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
index a314fa638dc3..4acedddfb01e 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/splice.h>
+#include <linux/unaligned.h>
#include <crypto/aead.h>
#include <net/strparser.h>
@@ -1005,6 +1006,150 @@ static int tls_sw_sendmsg_locked(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
return copied > 0 ? copied : ret;
}
+/* RFC 9846 section 5.5 allows 2^24.5 full-size records per AES-GCM key.
+ * Send the KeyUpdate a little earlier.
+ */
+#define TLS_KEYUPDATE_TX_RECORDS BIT_ULL(24)
+
+/* Section 4.7.3: the epoch must not exceed 2^48-1. The application
+ * traffic secrets start at epoch 3.
+ */
+#define TLS_KEYUPDATE_MAX (BIT_ULL(48) - 4)
+
+/* Send a KeyUpdate with the current key, then install the next key.
+ * Called with tx_lock held and the socket locked.
+ */
+static int tls_tx_key_update(struct sock *sk, u8 request, int flags)
+{
+ u8 body[TLS_KEYUPDATE_MSG_SIZE] = {
+ TLS_HANDSHAKE_KEYUPDATE, 0, 0, 1, request
+ };
+ struct tls_context *tls_ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
+ struct tls_sw_context_tx *ctx = tls_sw_ctx_tx(tls_ctx);
+ u8 record_type = TLS_RECORD_TYPE_HANDSHAKE;
+ u8 buf[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(record_type))];
+ struct msghdr msg = {};
+ struct cmsghdr *cmsg;
+ struct kvec iov;
+ int ret;
+
+ memset(buf, 0, sizeof(buf));
+ msg.msg_control = buf;
+ msg.msg_controllen = sizeof(buf);
+ msg.msg_flags = flags & MSG_DONTWAIT;
+
+ cmsg = CMSG_FIRSTHDR(&msg);
+ cmsg->cmsg_level = SOL_TLS;
+ cmsg->cmsg_type = TLS_SET_RECORD_TYPE;
+ cmsg->cmsg_len = CMSG_LEN(sizeof(record_type));
+ memcpy(CMSG_DATA(cmsg), &record_type, sizeof(record_type));
+
+ iov.iov_base = body;
+ iov.iov_len = sizeof(body);
+ iov_iter_kvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, &iov, 1, sizeof(body));
+
+ /* A control record closes the open record first, so all data
+ * written so far goes out with the current key, ahead of the
+ * KeyUpdate.
+ */
+ ret = tls_sw_sendmsg_locked(sk, &msg, sizeof(body));
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* Nothing may be encrypted with the next key before the KeyUpdate
+ * is encrypted with the current one.
+ */
+ ret = tls_encrypt_async_wait(ctx);
+ if (!ret)
+ ret = tls_keyupdate_rekey(sk, 1);
+ if (ret) {
+ /* The peer expects the next key: the connection is lost */
+ TLS_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TLSTXREKEYERROR);
+ tls_err_abort(sk, ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ TLS_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TLSTXREKEYOK);
+ tls_ctx->tx_key_updates++;
+ if (request == TLS_KEY_UPDATE_NOT_REQUESTED)
+ tls_ctx->tx_key_update_reply = false;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* Send a KeyUpdate if one is due: in reply to the peer's
+ * update_requested (RFC 9846 section 4.7.3), or before the key reaches
+ * its record limit (section 5.5). ChaCha20-Poly1305 has no record limit:
+ * the sequence number would wrap first.
+ */
+static int tls_tx_key_update_if_due(struct sock *sk, int flags)
+{
+ struct tls_context *ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
+ bool limit;
+
+ if (likely(!ctx->tx_secret.len))
+ return 0;
+
+ limit = ctx->prot_info.cipher_type != TLS_CIPHER_CHACHA20_POLY1305 &&
+ get_unaligned_be64(ctx->tx.rec_seq) >= TLS_KEYUPDATE_TX_RECORDS;
+ if (!limit && !ctx->tx_key_update_reply)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (ctx->tx_key_updates >= TLS_KEYUPDATE_MAX) {
+ /* Ignore update_requested. At the record limit the
+ * connection must end.
+ */
+ ctx->tx_key_update_reply = false;
+ return limit ? -EKEYEXPIRED : 0;
+ }
+
+ return tls_tx_key_update(sk, TLS_KEY_UPDATE_NOT_REQUESTED, flags);
+}
+
+/**
+ * tls_sw_key_update - send a KeyUpdate now, for TLS_TX_KEY_UPDATE
+ * @sk: socket
+ * @request: non-zero to also ask the peer to update its key
+ *
+ * Called with tx_lock held and the socket locked.
+ *
+ * Return: 0 on success, or a negative errno.
+ */
+int tls_sw_key_update(struct sock *sk, int request)
+{
+ struct tls_context *ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!ctx->tx_secret.len)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (request) {
+ /* Only the kernel sees the answer */
+ if (!ctx->rx_secret.len)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ /* Section 4.7.3: wait for the answer to the previous one */
+ if (ctx->tx_key_update_asked)
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+
+ if (ctx->tx_key_updates >= TLS_KEYUPDATE_MAX - 1)
+ return -EKEYEXPIRED;
+
+ /* A reply must carry update_not_requested */
+ if (request && ctx->tx_key_update_reply) {
+ ret = tls_tx_key_update(sk, TLS_KEY_UPDATE_NOT_REQUESTED, 0);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = tls_tx_key_update(sk, request ? TLS_KEY_UPDATE_REQUESTED :
+ TLS_KEY_UPDATE_NOT_REQUESTED, 0);
+ if (!ret && request)
+ ctx->tx_key_update_asked = true;
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
int tls_sw_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size)
{
struct tls_context *tls_ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
@@ -1019,7 +1164,9 @@ int tls_sw_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size)
if (ret)
return ret;
lock_sock(sk);
- ret = tls_sw_sendmsg_locked(sk, msg, size);
+ ret = tls_tx_key_update_if_due(sk, msg->msg_flags);
+ if (!ret)
+ ret = tls_sw_sendmsg_locked(sk, msg, size);
release_sock(sk);
mutex_unlock(&tls_ctx->tx_lock);
return ret;
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-26 0:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-26 0:36 [PATCH RFC net-next 0/5] tls: perform TLS 1.3 KeyUpdate in the kernel Martin Belanger via B4 Relay
2026-10-26 0:36 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 1/5] tls: add HKDF-Expand-Label for the TLS 1.3 key schedule Martin Belanger via B4 Relay
2026-10-26 7:27 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-10-26 11:25 ` Martin Belanger
2026-10-26 0:36 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 2/5] tls: add socket options to register the traffic secrets Martin Belanger via B4 Relay
2026-10-26 7:37 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-10-26 11:27 ` Martin Belanger
2026-10-26 0:36 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 3/5] tls: update the RX key when a KeyUpdate is received Martin Belanger via B4 Relay
2026-10-26 7:53 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-10-26 11:28 ` Martin Belanger
2026-10-26 0:36 ` Martin Belanger via B4 Relay [this message]
2026-10-26 0:36 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 5/5] selftests/tls: add KeyUpdate tests Martin Belanger via B4 Relay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261025-keyupdate-rfc-v1-4-60b7756eccbd@gmail.com \
--to=devnull+martin.nvme.dev.gmail.com@kernel.org \
--cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=hare@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=martin.belanger@dell.com \
--cc=martin.nvme.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox