From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, axboe@kernel.dk, hch@lst.de,
Chris Mason <mason@kernel.org>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/19] nvmet-rdma: queue the release work under the mutex
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2026 07:10:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261103061046.GJ1862@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261029155252.2332266-15-kbusch@meta.com>
On Thu, Oct 29, 2026 at 08:52:47AM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> From: Chris Mason <mason@kernel.org>
>
> nvmet_rdma_remove_one() takes the queue mutex, unlists each queue of
> the device and queues its release work, then flushes nvmet-wq. So a
> queue that still holds objects on the device must either be on the
> list or have its release work queued. nvmet_rdma_queue_disconnect()
> breaks that: it unlists the queue under the mutex, drops it, and only
> then calls __nvmet_rdma_queue_disconnect() to queue the work. A device
> removal in that window finds nothing to wait for, and the release work
> then destroys the QP and CQ share on a freed device.
>
> Queue the work before dropping the mutex, as nvmet_rdma_remove_one()
> itself does. That's safe now that rdma_disconnect() no longer sleeps on
> an iWARP event that needs the same mutex.
>
> Fixes: f1d4ef7d8883 ("nvmet-rdma: register ib_client to not deadlock in device removal")
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
> Cc: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <mason@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/target/rdma.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/rdma.c b/drivers/nvme/target/rdma.c
> index fe91df653e5cf..35fd3f3c35dc1 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/target/rdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/rdma.c
> @@ -1744,17 +1744,17 @@ static void __nvmet_rdma_queue_disconnect(struct nvmet_rdma_queue *queue)
>
> static void nvmet_rdma_queue_disconnect(struct nvmet_rdma_queue *queue)
> {
> - bool disconnect = false;
> -
> + /*
> + * The release work is queued with the mutex held, so that
> + * nvmet_rdma_remove_one() finds the queue on the list or its work on
> + * the workqueue.
Odd sentence structure once again:
/*
* Queue the release work is with &nvmet_rdma_queue_mutex held, so that
* nvmet_rdma_remove_one() either finds the queue on the list or its
* the work has already been queued.
*/
Otherwise looks good:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-03 6:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-29 15:52 [PATCH 00/19] nvme patch pile Keith Busch
2026-10-29 15:52 ` [PATCH 01/19] nvme-loop: delete the controller if a reset fails Keith Busch
2026-11-03 5:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-29 15:52 ` [PATCH 02/19] nvmet-tcp: ask for the TLS record type on every receive Keith Busch
2026-10-29 15:52 ` [PATCH 03/19] nvme-fabrics: reconnect if the association is gone Keith Busch
2026-11-03 5:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-29 15:52 ` [PATCH 04/19] nvmet-auth: keep the old keys if the new ones fail Keith Busch
2026-11-03 5:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-29 15:52 ` [PATCH 05/19] nvmet: accept I/O queues on the controller's port only Keith Busch
2026-11-03 6:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-29 15:52 ` [PATCH 06/19] nvmet: check the host NQN against the TLS PSK identity Keith Busch
2026-11-03 6:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-29 15:52 ` [PATCH 07/19] nvmet-tcp: let the accept work come to an end Keith Busch
2026-11-03 6:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-29 15:52 ` [PATCH 08/19] nvme-tcp: start error recovery when a send fails Keith Busch
2026-10-29 16:17 ` Maurizio Lombardi
2026-10-29 15:52 ` [PATCH 09/19] nvmet: fix pc_ref use-after-free in preempt and abort Keith Busch
2026-11-03 6:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-29 15:52 ` [PATCH 10/19] nvmet: move preempt and abort work off nvmet-wq Keith Busch
2026-10-29 15:52 ` [PATCH 11/19] nvmet-rdma: treat a failed connect as a disconnect Keith Busch
2026-11-03 6:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-29 15:52 ` [PATCH 12/19] nvmet-rdma: disconnect only established queues Keith Busch
2026-11-03 6:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-29 15:52 ` [PATCH 13/19] nvmet-rdma: take a device off the list last Keith Busch
2026-11-03 6:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-29 15:52 ` [PATCH 14/19] nvmet-rdma: queue the release work under the mutex Keith Busch
2026-11-03 6:10 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-10-29 15:52 ` [PATCH 15/19] nvmet-rdma: disconnect a queue on device removal Keith Busch
2026-11-03 6:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-29 15:52 ` [PATCH 16/19] nvmet-rdma: reject queues larger than max_cqe Keith Busch
2026-11-03 6:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-29 15:52 ` [PATCH 17/19] nvmet-rdma: don't run the wait list recursively Keith Busch
2026-10-29 15:52 ` [PATCH 18/19] nvmet-rdma: fix a lost run of the wait list Keith Busch
2026-10-29 15:52 ` [PATCH 19/19] nvmet: wait only for executing I/O in preempt and abort Keith Busch
2026-11-03 6:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-11-04 20:37 ` (subset) [PATCH 00/19] nvme patch pile Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261103061046.GJ1862@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kbusch@meta.com \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mason@kernel.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox