Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mohamed Khalfella <mkhalfella@purestorage.com>
To: zhang san <shunsheng1218@gmail.com>
Cc: kbusch@kernel.org, axboe@fb.com, hch@lst.de, sagi@grimberg.me,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Question: NVMe AER completion delivery during controller removal
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2026 11:08:54 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261109190854.GA765534-mkhalfella@purestorage.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGTEBTa9dGn8TjKxRPsfeCFiRYAt-cGMAp-XSLBS86SHB6FJ_A@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed 2026-11-04 12:50:42 +0800, zhang san wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> We are seeking clarification about asynchronous event request (AER)
> completion behavior during NVMe controller removal, before treating an
> observed test failure as a production-reachable driver bug.
> 
> Our source analysis suggests a possible lifetime race between the AEN
> completion path, which can requeue nvme_async_event_work, and the
> controller removal path. We observed KASAN use-after-free in an
> emulated environment on Linux v7.4-rc1 (6628e7d4c6b2).


My reading of the code suggests this can happen. nvme_stop_ctrl()
flushes async_event_work, but the admin queue can still deliver an AER
completion afterwards, either from the admin queue interrupt handler or
from the final admin CQ poll in nvme_dev_disable():

nvme_remove() ->
  nvme_dev_disable() ->
    nvme_poll_irqdisable(&dev->queues[0]) ->
      nvme_poll_cq() ->
        nvme_handle_cqe() ->
          nvme_complete_async_event() ->
	    queue_work(nvme_wq, &ctrl->async_event_work);


Nothing flushes async_event_work after that, so the work can run after
nvme_uninit_ctrl() drops the last reference and the nvme_dev is freed.

> 
> However, our test induced an ERROR AEN through an out-of-specification
> MMIO doorbell write while the device was being removed. This
> deliberately synthetic trigger does not establish that a compliant
> controller would generate the same completion.

--- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
@@ -3909,20 +3909,21 @@ static void nvme_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)

        if (!pci_device_is_present(pdev)) {
                nvme_change_ctrl_state(&dev->ctrl, NVME_CTRL_DEAD);
                nvme_dev_disable(dev, true);
        }

        flush_work(&dev->ctrl.reset_work);
        nvme_stop_ctrl(&dev->ctrl);
        nvme_remove_namespaces(&dev->ctrl);
        nvme_dev_disable(dev, true);
+       flush_work(&dev->ctrl.async_event_work);
        nvme_free_host_mem(dev);
        nvme_dev_remove_admin(dev);
        nvme_dbbuf_dma_free(dev);
        nvme_free_queues(dev, 0);
        mempool_destroy(dev->dmavec_mempool);
        nvme_release_descriptor_pools(dev);
        nvme_dev_unmap(dev);
        nvme_uninit_ctrl(&dev->ctrl);
 }

Since you are able to reproduce this issue reliabely, how about you try
the diff above and see if it fixes the issue.

> 
> Our main question is: can a specification-compliant controller deliver
> a completion for a previously submitted AER during the interval in
> which the host is disabling the controller and tearing down the admin
> queue, or must such completions be quiesced before disable completes?
> We would also welcome guidance on the exact point after which the host
> may safely assume that no further AER completions can be delivered.

If the above diff fixes the issue for you, then I think this is a driver
bug.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-09 19:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-04  4:50 Question: NVMe AER completion delivery during controller removal zhang san
2026-11-09 19:08 ` Mohamed Khalfella [this message]
2026-11-09 19:32   ` Mohamed Khalfella

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261109190854.GA765534-mkhalfella@purestorage.com \
    --to=mkhalfella@purestorage.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=shunsheng1218@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox