public inbox for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Hart" <jfhart085@gmail.com>
To: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Cc: jfhart085@gmail.com, kbusch@kernel.org, axboe@fb.com, hch@lst.de,
	sagi@grimberg.me, hch@lst.de
Subject: Re: nvme nvme0: I/O 0 (I/O Cmd) QID 1 timeout, aborting, source drive corruption observed
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2022 00:07:46 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <26d4d46f-0ffe-44dc-de40-b18729ab3783@gmail.com> (raw)

I have done an fsck check on the /dev/nvme0n1p3 file system after the 
rsync invocation referenced earlier.  In the first run I found errors 
which fsck should have repaired if I understand correctly.  In repeating 
the fsck invocation immediately afterwards, I found errors again each time.
This was done using the replacement Samsung nvme ssd (Samsung 970 EVO 
Plus 500G).

Here is the output :

-bash-3.2# fsck -f -C /dev/nvme0n1p3
fsck from util-linux 2.34
e2fsck 1.42.12 (29-Aug-2014)
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Pass 2: Checking directory structure 

Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity 

Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Pass 5: Checking group summary information 

Block bitmap differences:  -87163220 -87163384 -87187960 -122079572 
-122079736
Fix<y>? yes
 

/dev/nvme0n1p3: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
/dev/nvme0n1p3: 699563/30523392 files (0.1% non-contiguous), 
13841458/122079744 blocks
-bash-3.2# fsck -f -C /dev/nvme0n1p3
fsck from util-linux 2.34
e2fsck 1.42.12 (29-Aug-2014)
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Pass 2: Checking directory structure 

Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity 

Pass 4: Checking reference counts 

Pass 5: Checking group summary information 

Block bitmap differences:  -87163220 -87163384 -122079736 

Fix<y>? yes
 

/dev/nvme0n1p3: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
/dev/nvme0n1p3: 699563/30523392 files (0.1% non-contiguous), 
13841458/122079744 blocks
-bash-3.2# fsck -f -C /dev/nvme0n1p3
fsck from util-linux 2.34
e2fsck 1.42.12 (29-Aug-2014)
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Pass 2: Checking directory structure 

Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity 

Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Pass 5: Checking group summary information 

Block bitmap differences:  -87163220 -87163384 -122079572 -122079736 

Fix<y>? yes
 

/dev/nvme0n1p3: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
/dev/nvme0n1p3: 699563/30523392 files (0.1% non-contiguous), 
13841458/122079744 blocks


I also tried loading a smaller partition on the Samsung card at 
/dev/nvme0n1p3.  The copy stopped with a "no space left on device" 
error, which should not have been possible as the source device is a 
32MB partition, and the destination partition on the nvme ssd is a 64MB 
partition.  The two files to be transferred were very small and could 
not have accounted for this as they totaled less than 5MB. I found file 
system damage on the nvme destination partition in this case as well. 
It also occurred repeatedly. I am still investigating this last case.

In no instance did I note any otherwise unusual log messages or errors 
from the nvme driver.

I do not yet know if there has been any damage to any other filesystems, 
but I will check.

J. Hart


             reply	other threads:[~2022-12-17 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-17 15:07 J. Hart [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-12-18 12:08 nvme nvme0: I/O 0 (I/O Cmd) QID 1 timeout, aborting, source drive corruption observed J. Hart
2022-12-19 14:45 ` Keith Busch
2022-12-19 23:40   ` J. Hart
2022-12-20 18:10     ` Keith Busch
2022-12-20 14:04   ` J. Hart
2022-12-18  6:20 J. Hart
2022-12-17 21:57 J. Hart
2022-12-17 16:14 J. Hart
2022-12-17 12:07 J. Hart
2022-12-15  1:38 J. Hart
2022-12-15  8:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-15  9:07   ` J. Hart
2022-12-15  9:09     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-15  9:15       ` J. Hart
2022-12-15 13:33       ` J. Hart
2022-12-15 17:34         ` Keith Busch
2022-12-15 22:30           ` J. Hart
2022-12-16  6:39             ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-16 19:08               ` Keith Busch
2023-01-18 10:27             ` Mark Ruijter
2022-12-16 23:16 ` Keith Busch
2022-12-17  1:28   ` J. Hart
2022-12-19 14:41     ` Keith Busch
2022-12-20  1:10       ` J. Hart
2022-12-20 16:56         ` Keith Busch
2022-12-21  7:50           ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=26d4d46f-0ffe-44dc-de40-b18729ab3783@gmail.com \
    --to=jfhart085@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox