[PATCH RFC 1/2] nvme-rdma: Support 8K inline

[swise@opengridcomputing.com (Steve Wise)]

On 5/11/2018 1:48 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> -#define NVME_RDMA_MAX_INLINE_SEGMENTS	1
>> +#define NVME_RDMA_MAX_INLINE_SEGMENTS	2
> Given how little space we use for just the sge array maybe we
> want to bump this to 4 once we need to deal with multiple entries?

Agreed.

>>  static int nvme_rdma_map_sg_inline(struct nvme_rdma_queue *queue,
>> -		struct nvme_rdma_request *req, struct nvme_command *c)
>> +		struct nvme_rdma_request *req, int count,
>> +		struct nvme_command *c)
> Just gut feeling, but I'd pass the count argument last.

Yea ok.

>>  	struct nvme_sgl_desc *sg = &c->common.dptr.sgl;
>> +	u32 len;
>>  
>>  	req->sge[1].addr = sg_dma_address(req->sg_table.sgl);
>>  	req->sge[1].length = sg_dma_len(req->sg_table.sgl);
>>  	req->sge[1].lkey = queue->device->pd->local_dma_lkey;
>> +	len = req->sge[1].length;
>> +	if (count == 2) {
>> +		req->sge[2].addr = sg_dma_address(req->sg_table.sgl+1);
>> +		req->sge[2].length = sg_dma_len(req->sg_table.sgl+1);
>> +		req->sge[2].lkey = queue->device->pd->local_dma_lkey;
>> +		len += req->sge[2].length;
>> +	}
> I think this should be turned into a for loop, e.g.

Yes, And I think in the previous incarnation of this patch series, Sagi
suggested an iterator pointer vs sge[blah].

> 	u32 len, i;
>
> 	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> 		req->sge[1 + i].addr = sg_dma_address(&req->sg_table.sgl[i]);
> 		req->sge[1 + i].length = sg_dma_len(&req->sg_table.sgl[i]);
> 		req->sge[1 + i].lkey = queue->device->pd->local_dma_lkey;
> 		req->num_sge++;
> 		len += req->sge[i + 1].length;
> 	}
> 		
>> -	if (count == 1) {
>> +	if (count <= 2) {
> This should be NVME_RDMA_MAX_INLINE_SEGMENTS.

Yup.

Thanks for reviewing!

Steve.