From: James Smart <jsmart2021@gmail.com>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@wdc.com>,
James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme/fc: Short-circuit reconnect retries
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 13:48:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <373a627a-2c14-32c8-935b-6aa60ba22272@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4348b2a1-0861-0020-e873-0680812c4849@grimberg.me>
On 5/21/2021 1:17 PM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
>> if (recon && nvmf_should_reconnect(&ctrl->ctrl)) {
>> @@ -3286,12 +3290,17 @@ nvme_fc_reconnect_or_delete(struct
>> nvme_fc_ctrl *ctrl, int status)
>> queue_delayed_work(nvme_wq, &ctrl->connect_work, recon_delay);
>> } else {
>> - if (portptr->port_state == FC_OBJSTATE_ONLINE)
>> - dev_warn(ctrl->ctrl.device,
>> - "NVME-FC{%d}: Max reconnect attempts (%d) "
>> - "reached.\n",
>> - ctrl->cnum, ctrl->ctrl.nr_reconnects);
>> - else
>> + if (portptr->port_state == FC_OBJSTATE_ONLINE) {
>> + if (status > 0 && (status & NVME_SC_DNR))
>> + dev_warn(ctrl->ctrl.device,
>> + "NVME-FC{%d}: reconnect failure\n",
>
> Maybe worth to print the status here?
>
> Otherwise looks good,
> Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
>
Agree with Sagi that the print should have the status.
Reviewed-by: James Smart <jsmart2021@gmail.com>
-- james
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-21 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-21 8:23 [PATCH] nvme/fc: Short-circuit reconnect retries Hannes Reinecke
2021-05-21 17:28 ` Himanshu Madhani
2021-05-21 20:17 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-05-21 20:48 ` James Smart [this message]
2021-05-22 9:48 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-05-25 7:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=373a627a-2c14-32c8-935b-6aa60ba22272@gmail.com \
--to=jsmart2021@gmail.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
--cc=keith.busch@wdc.com \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox