From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] nvme-tcp: improve scalability
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 16:06:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3dfdf2e8-800b-4e87-a65f-f32fdb5018b0@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <33f72b7d-d1da-4c5d-8aa1-1df2559b9588@grimberg.me>
On 7/10/24 13:56, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
>
> On 08/07/2024 10:10, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> for workloads with a lot of controllers we run into workqueue contention,
>> where the single workqueue is not able to service requests fast enough,
>> leading to spurious I/O errors and connect resets during high load.
>> This patchset improves the situation by improve the fairness between
>> rx and tx scheduling, introducing per-controller workqueues,
>> and distribute the load accoring to the blk-mq cpu mapping.
>> With this we reduce the spurious I/O errors and improve the overall
>> performance for highly contended workloads.
>>
>> All performance number are derived from the 'tiobench-example.fio'
>
> Did you keep the fio file unmodified? I'd suggest to run it for longer
> say 60 seconds each workload. 512 MB is a very short benchmark...
Not for 32 queues :-)
But yeah, I can keep it running for slightly longer.
Not making much progress, mind; your 'softirq' patch definitely speeds
up receiving, but seem to messing up the write side such that I'm
basically guaranteed to hit I/O timeouts on WRITE :-(
Keep on debugging ...
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-10 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-08 7:10 [PATCHv2 0/3] nvme-tcp: improve scalability Hannes Reinecke
2024-07-08 7:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] nvme-tcp: improve rx/tx fairness Hannes Reinecke
2024-07-08 11:57 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-08 13:21 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-07-08 14:25 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-08 15:50 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-07-08 19:31 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-09 6:51 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-07-09 7:06 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-08 7:10 ` [PATCH 2/3] nvme-tcp: align I/O cpu with blk-mq mapping Hannes Reinecke
2024-07-08 12:08 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-08 12:43 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-07-08 14:38 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-08 7:10 ` [PATCH 3/3] nvme-tcp: per-controller I/O workqueues Hannes Reinecke
2024-07-08 12:12 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-08 12:48 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-07-08 14:41 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-10 11:56 ` [PATCHv2 0/3] nvme-tcp: improve scalability Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-10 14:06 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2024-07-10 14:45 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-16 6:31 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-16 7:10 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3dfdf2e8-800b-4e87-a65f-f32fdb5018b0@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hare@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox