linux-nvme.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: arjan@linux.intel.com (Arjan van de Ven)
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] nvme: fix the placement of set_current_state to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:30:23 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5123A89F.9010608@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130219150538.GA4530@linux.intel.com>

On 2/19/2013 7:05 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013@02:45:41PM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> the nvme driver has a kthread that processes certain events periodically.
>> However, the kthread also gets woken for certain urgent actions.
>>
>> The current code does not use the current_state logic correctly;
>> it calls set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); right before doing
>> a schedule_timeout(), with the result that there is a race condition
>> where a wakeup can get lost, and thus delayed by one second.
>>
>> This patch moves the set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); to before
>> the place where the queue of outstanding work is checked, to close
>> the race condition
>
> The thing is, that's not a queue of outstanding work, that's the list
> of devices that exist in the system.  Your patch makes the kthread do
> all of its work in the TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE state, which I don't think is
> right either (is it?)

eh why not?
it counts to load average, but frankly, you're using CPU... you count anyway

      reply	other threads:[~2013-02-19 16:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <51103A15.8010508@linux.intel.com>
2013-02-19 15:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme: fix the placement of set_current_state to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE Matthew Wilcox
2013-02-19 16:30   ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5123A89F.9010608@linux.intel.com \
    --to=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).