From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: hare@kernel.org, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
Martin George <marting@netapp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: enable retries for authentication commands
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 10:18:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53d98444-16b1-48bb-a3f2-ecd897a29299@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d4a814f5-0dc9-46d9-8c5c-eaa31cd889f4@suse.de>
On 1/25/24 10:09 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 1/25/24 17:50, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 1/25/24 9:20 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>> On 1/25/24 16:48, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 08:42:10AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>>> On 1/25/24 6:09 AM, hare@kernel.org wrote:
>>>>>> From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Authentication commands are normal NVMe commands, and as such
>>>>>> can return a status where NVME_SC_DNR is not set, indicating
>>>>>> that the command should be retried.
>>>>>> Rather than checking NVME_SC_DNR manually for each command completion
>>>>>> this patch adds a flag 'retry' to __nvme_submit_sync_cmd(), causing
>>>>>> the REQ_FAILFAST_DRIVER option to be cleared and the command to
>>>>>> be retried via the normal mechanism.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can we please do this without adding Yet Another parameter to that
>>>>> function?
>>>>
>>>> Heh, I wrote about the same reply a few minutes ago. I'll try to think
>>>> what we can do instead.
>>>
>>> We could do something like this:
>>
>> That won't really do much, and yeah wouldn't be the way even if
>> complete. How about just not setting the flag in the first place?
>> nvme_init_request() defaults to doing it, so either pass in the init
>> flags to that, or just clear it in there and have the callers decide if
>> they want to set it.
>>
> But that's the thing; the request is never visible to the caller.
> So moving things out of the nvme_init_request() doesn't really help.
>
> And open-coding __nvme_submit_sync_cmd() also doesn't look very
> appealing.
__nvme_submit_sync_cmd() already takes another bool (at_head) and blk-mq
flags. You could have it take some nvme specific flags instead, and fold
those two parameters into a single flags. Once that is done, adding the
retry flag on top would be trivial.
And as a side benefit, it gets RID of a bool flag rather than add
another random one.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-25 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-25 13:09 [PATCH] nvme: enable retries for authentication commands hare
2024-01-25 15:42 ` Jens Axboe
2024-01-25 15:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-25 16:20 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-01-25 16:50 ` Jens Axboe
2024-01-25 17:09 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-01-25 17:18 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53d98444-16b1-48bb-a3f2-ecd897a29299@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hare@kernel.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marting@netapp.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox