From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B93FC25B75 for ; Sat, 1 Jun 2024 01:50:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=V8WfBxq8XLRTBZ5tQIhY0Q9aeK+UOqcJTpHkcaQ+TpQ=; b=OaDtPf8Tt9OXXn8MHpX+8YqbBL 3qkAKglVGV6Q3bluFdamv/8cmeJNYZu5USva8m6k2Dw5xA7elqwFbwfcBjtBcjnUIKxf9t7As2PiY Sr6AJMUxouO8G2Tcya9mGrnsMecPn2DW4P1UGb9mUAisv5LqTNggS/x4b1ZF4tYXE1Iudr0iLN+/p EQMMxdnjdo9fybRKpDa43XgVpBsRQwRYzyJiIy+hfGz7VLVmn4Ap+Pf3Vd9Yy9F78EbNjQJ27KGvF wW0/6Okp5DsbLoYI8dZQX00R/GfNjT+8ny+82gLJnYe0wJJOS6PO3Fm53MugE1gonGTBm+cfW63xt 0n2kndkw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sDDse-0000000BoI8-3uGC; Sat, 01 Jun 2024 01:50:00 +0000 Received: from out-179.mta0.migadu.com ([91.218.175.179]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sDDsb-0000000BoGe-1Dvy for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 01 Jun 2024 01:49:59 +0000 X-Envelope-To: bvanassche@acm.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1717206585; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=V8WfBxq8XLRTBZ5tQIhY0Q9aeK+UOqcJTpHkcaQ+TpQ=; b=h1JCQf3bfvXrbdLOdGdABlt8LfZALDMGbAVnfTqDUYOxSM3Tq18lpwx0IEIulB64lhNDA3 hEnw9oEijJgYuLz0ms7jokSKK7Z/9F0rB7hrgOkVmnHSUmodBVnfAwpV9MjYzzJQb9nOBk 94sVvCusQLEVWDHsZow2xEDcZ6Ha9cQ= X-Envelope-To: zyjzyj2000@gmail.com X-Envelope-To: shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com X-Envelope-To: linux-block@vger.kernel.org X-Envelope-To: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org X-Envelope-To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org X-Envelope-To: nbd@other.debian.org X-Envelope-To: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <53f5e515-bad2-4094-ab7a-64d807ce1223@linux.dev> Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2024 03:49:39 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: blktests failures with v6.10-rc1 kernel To: Bart Van Assche , Zhu Yanjun Cc: Shinichiro Kawasaki , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "nbd@other.debian.org" , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" References: <6cd21274-50b3-44c5-af48-179cbd08b1ba@linux.dev> <0a82785a-a417-4f53-8f3a-2a9ad3ab3bf7@acm.org> <81a63f38-fab0-4536-bbc2-3f06752a7f9e@acm.org> X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Zhu Yanjun In-Reply-To: <81a63f38-fab0-4536-bbc2-3f06752a7f9e@acm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240531_184957_490885_24E5F5AC X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.92 ) X-BeenThere: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-nvme" Errors-To: linux-nvme-bounces+linux-nvme=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org 在 2024/5/31 22:46, Bart Van Assche 写道: > On 5/31/24 13:35, Zhu Yanjun wrote: >> On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 10:08 PM Bart Van Assche >> wrote: >>> >>> On 5/31/24 13:06, Zhu Yanjun wrote: >>>> On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 10:01 PM Bart Van Assche >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 5/31/24 07:35, Zhu Yanjun wrote: >>>>>> IIRC, the problem with srp/002, 011 also occurs with siw driver, >>>>>> do you make >>>>>> tests with siw driver to verify whether the problem with srp/002, >>>>>> 011 is also > fixed or not? >>>>> >>>>> I have not yet seen any failures of any of the SRP tests when using >>>>> the siw driver. >>>>> What am I missing? >>>   > >>>   > (left out a bunch of forwarded emails) >>> >>> Forwarding emails is not useful, especially if these emails do not >>> answer the question >>> that I asked. >> >> Bob had made tests with siw. From his mail, it seems that the similar >> problem also occurs with SIW. > > I'm not aware of anyone other than Bob having reported failures of the > SRP tests > in combination with the siw driver. At that time, I had not reproduce this problem with SIW, either. Zhu Yanjun > > Thanks, > > Bart. >