From: paul.grabinar@ranbarg.com (Paul Grabinar)
Subject: CQ Doorbells can be touched after queue deleted
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:55:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <542B0A97.90309@ranbarg.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.03.1409301309230.4688@AMR>
On 30/09/14 20:41, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, Paul Grabinar wrote:
>> I've encountered an interesting issue with the driver as in v3.17-rc7.
>> The NVMe specification defines writing to CQ doorbells for non-existent
>> queues as "undefined", so it is probably not a good idea to do this.
>> I'm aware of at least one drive that gets very upset if you try.
>>
>> The case I hit was where there is I/O running to the drive, but the
>> drive is being reset in the kthread due to not responding to abort
>> requests.
>> When an I/O request came in, nvme_process_cq was called from
>> nvme_make_request, but the queue no longer exists as it has been torn
>> down by the reset.
>> During nvme_process_cq, the doorbell is updated, which upsets the drive.
>>
>> This is a bit of a corner case, but it has happened.
>> We probably need to skip the doorbell update if the queue has been
>> deleted.
>
> Thanks for the info. I agree the results are undefined in this case. Your
> situation is interesting, though. The driver won't update the doorbell
> if no completions were posted, so it sounds like your device is posting
> completions long after the queues were deleted if the problem occured
> in the make_request path.
>
> Anyway, here's a patch.
>
>> From a141c8116d1d8f86fffb58bb312ec4d75cdc82ef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Keith Busch <keith.busch at intel.com>
> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 12:51:06 -0600
> Subject: [PATCH] NVMe: Skip updating cq doorbell on inactive queues
>
> The driver processes the completion queue after taking queues offline to
> check for new completions that may have occured when the device deleted
> the queue. We don't want to write the completion queue doorbell in this
> case as it has undefined results.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch at intel.com>
> Reported-by: Paul Grabinar <paul.grabinar at ranbarg.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/nvme-core.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/nvme-core.c b/drivers/block/nvme-core.c
> index 28aec2d..6c077cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/nvme-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/nvme-core.c
> @@ -828,7 +828,8 @@ static int nvme_process_cq(struct nvme_queue *nvmeq)
> if (head == nvmeq->cq_head && phase == nvmeq->cq_phase)
> return 0;
>
> - writel(head, nvmeq->q_db + nvmeq->dev->db_stride);
> + if (!nvmeq->q_suspended)
> + writel(head, nvmeq->q_db + nvmeq->dev->db_stride);
> nvmeq->cq_head = head;
> nvmeq->cq_phase = phase;
>
Hi,
Yes, good point. I guess there are still commands that are being
processed and we are getting late completions.
Thanks for the patch.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-30 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-30 18:32 CQ Doorbells can be touched after queue deleted Paul Grabinar
2014-09-30 19:41 ` Keith Busch
2014-09-30 19:55 ` Paul Grabinar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=542B0A97.90309@ranbarg.com \
--to=paul.grabinar@ranbarg.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox