From: axboe@kernel.dk (Jens Axboe)
Subject: [patch] NVMe: return an error code if blk_mq_alloc_tag_set() fails
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:15:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54C1847E.6010206@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1501222252300.15481@localhost.lm.intel.com>
On 01/22/2015 04:11 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 01/22/2015 09:48 AM, Keith Busch wrote:
>>> Should we bail on the device if tagset allocation fails? If so, the
>>> patch
>>> is good, but I thought it was a concious descision to not return error
>>> here so the controller can be managed. Capabilities would be limited
>>> and a failure here probably means there's a bigger problem, so I'm okay
>>> either way.
>>
>> That's a good point, you could still send admin IO through the ioctls
>> even if this fails. Looking at the rest of the function, the error
>> handling is a bit strange. If we fail the nvme_identify(), we'll just
>> march on. If the next works, we're good, we return success. But if the
>> failed one happens to be the last one, we return error.
>
> It's a little simpler than that. The return value is unconditionally
> cleared to 0 at the end so we always return success if the first
> nvme_identify() was successful. I wouldn't trust a controller that
> couldn't identify itself, but the remaining commands are for namespace
> identification which can legitimately return errors.
Ah correct, I missed that unconditional clear. I think it looks fine then.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-22 23:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-19 14:43 [patch] NVMe: return an error code if blk_mq_alloc_tag_set() fails Dan Carpenter
2015-01-22 4:40 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-22 16:48 ` Keith Busch
2015-01-22 22:46 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-22 23:11 ` Keith Busch
2015-01-22 23:15 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54C1847E.6010206@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox