From: axboe@fb.com (Jens Axboe)
Subject: [PATCH, RFC] blk-mq: use a delayed work item for timeouts
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 14:08:04 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <561C1324.3030800@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <561C0B3C.70004@fb.com>
On 10/12/2015 01:34 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 10/12/2015 01:29 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> For some pending NVMe work I'd really love to be able to get my timeouts
>> from process context. So far it seems only SCSI and NVMe use the blk-mq
>> timeout handler, and both don't seem to be particularly excited about
>> being called from time context. Does anyone have an objection against
>> the patch below that switches it to use a delayed work item? I could
>> make use of this quickly for NVMe, but for SCSI we still have to deal
>> with the old request code which can't be switched to a delayed work
>> as easily.
>
> No that's definitely fine with me, imho most error handling callbacks
> should be in process context for ease of use in the driver.
Took a closer look. The patch looks incomplete. The hot path for blk-mq
is blk_add_timer(), looks like you left that one alone in the conversion?
Might be easier to just leave the timer alone, and if it actually fires
_and_ we have to do something, punt to a workqueue instead of invoking
the timeout handler directly.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-12 20:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-12 19:29 [PATCH, RFC] blk-mq: use a delayed work item for timeouts Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-12 19:34 ` Jens Axboe
2015-10-12 20:08 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2015-10-12 20:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-12 20:26 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=561C1324.3030800@fb.com \
--to=axboe@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).