From: sagi@grimberg.me (Sagi Grimberg)
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] nvme-rdma: move admin queue cleanup to nvme_rdma_free_ctrl
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 09:01:31 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <578B1F3B.3020100@grimberg.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0a9b01d1deb0$d46ba5d0$7d42f170$@opengridcomputing.com>
> Hey Sagi, here is some lite reading for you. :)
>
> Prelude: As part of disconnecting an iwarp connection, the iwarp provider needs
> to post an IW_CM_EVENT_CLOSE event to iw_cm, which is scheduled onto the
> singlethread workq thread for iw_cm.
>
> Here is what happens with Sagi's patch:
>
> nvme_rdma_device_unplug() calls nvme_rdma_stop_queue() which calls
> rdma_disconnect(). This triggers the disconnect. iw_cxgb4 posts the
> IW_CM_EVENT_CLOSE to iw_cm, which ends up calling cm_close_handler() in the
> iw_cm workq thread context. cm_close_handler() calls the rdma_cm event handler
> for this cm_id, function cm_iw_handler(), which blocks until any currently
> running event handler for this cm_id finishes. It does this by calling
> cm_disable_callback(). However since this whole unplug process is running in
> the event handler function for this same cm_id, the iw_cm workq thread is now
> stuck in a deadlock. nvme_rdma_device_unplug() however, continues on and
> schedules the controller delete worker thread and waits for it to complete. The
> delete controller worker thread tries to disconnect and destroy all the
> remaining IO queues, but gets stuck in the destroy() path on the first IO queue
> because the iw_cm workq thread is already stuck, and processing the CLOSE event
> is required to release a reference the iw_cm has on the iwarp providers qp. So
> everything comes to a grinding halt....
>
> Now: Ming's 2 patches avoid this deadlock because the cm_id that received the
> device removal event is disconnected/destroyed _only after_ all the controller
> queues are disconnected/destroyed. So nvme_rdma_device_unplug() doesn't get
> stuck waiting for the controller to delete the io queues, and only after that
> completes, does it delete the cm_id/qp that got the device removal event. It
> then returns thus causing the rdma_cm to release the cm_id's callback mutex.
> This causes the iw_cm workq thread to now unblock and we continue on. (can you
> say house of cards?)
>
> So the net is: the cm_id that received the device remove event _must_ be
> disconnect/destroyed _last_.
Hey Steve, thanks for the detailed description.
IMHO, this really looks like a buggy design in iWARP connection
management implementation. The fact that a rdma_disconnect forward
progress is dependent on other cm_id execution looks wrong and
backwards to me.
Given that the device is being removed altogether I don't think that
calling rdma_disconnect is important at all. Given the fact that
ib_drain_qp makes sure that the queue-pair is in error state does
this incremental patch resolve the iwarp-deadlock you are seeing?
--
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
index fd90b5c00aae..e7eec7d8c705 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
@@ -1342,8 +1342,12 @@ static int nvme_rdma_device_unplug(struct
nvme_rdma_queue *queue)
goto queue_delete;
}
+ /*
+ * iwcm does not handle rdma_disconnect within DEVICE_REMOVAL
+ * event very well, so we settle with qp drain
+ */
+ ib_drain_qp(queue->qp);
/* Free this queue ourselves */
- nvme_rdma_stop_queue(queue);
nvme_rdma_destroy_queue_ib(queue);
/* Return non-zero so the cm_id will destroy implicitly */
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-17 6:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-13 21:26 [PATCH 0/2] nvme-rdma: device removal crash fixes Ming Lin
2016-07-13 21:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] nvme-rdma: grab reference for device removal event Ming Lin
2016-07-13 21:33 ` Steve Wise
2016-07-13 21:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme-rdma: move admin queue cleanup to nvme_rdma_free_ctrl Ming Lin
2016-07-13 21:33 ` Steve Wise
2016-07-13 23:19 ` J Freyensee
2016-07-13 23:36 ` Ming Lin
2016-07-13 23:59 ` J Freyensee
2016-07-14 6:39 ` Ming Lin
2016-07-14 17:09 ` J Freyensee
2016-07-14 18:04 ` Ming Lin
2016-07-14 9:15 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-07-14 9:17 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-07-14 14:30 ` Steve Wise
2016-07-14 14:44 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-07-14 14:59 ` Steve Wise
[not found] ` <011301d1dde0$4450e4e0$ccf2aea0$@opengridcomputing.com>
2016-07-14 15:02 ` Steve Wise
2016-07-14 15:26 ` Steve Wise
2016-07-14 21:27 ` Steve Wise
2016-07-15 15:52 ` Steve Wise
2016-07-17 6:01 ` Sagi Grimberg [this message]
2016-07-18 14:55 ` Steve Wise
2016-07-18 15:47 ` Steve Wise
2016-07-18 16:34 ` Steve Wise
2016-07-18 18:04 ` Steve Wise
2016-07-13 21:58 ` [PATCH 0/2] nvme-rdma: device removal crash fixes Steve Wise
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=578B1F3B.3020100@grimberg.me \
--to=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).