From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com (jianchao.wang) Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 17:12:17 +0800 Subject: [PATCH V2 8/8] blk-mq: remove blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter In-Reply-To: <15fa9443-776b-bb75-0e20-538609d34eba@suse.de> References: <1553492318-1810-1-git-send-email-jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com> <1553492318-1810-9-git-send-email-jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com> <47fe0e2a-f427-0e3e-e15b-a9e2bffb502f@suse.de> <15fa9443-776b-bb75-0e20-538609d34eba@suse.de> Message-ID: <5b8025dc-3aeb-c704-b539-9a2a926c2f02@oracle.com> On 3/25/19 4:25 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > On 3/25/19 8:37 AM, jianchao.wang wrote: >> Hi Hannes >> >> On 3/25/19 3:18 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote: >>> On 3/25/19 6:38 AM, Jianchao Wang wrote: >>>> As nobody uses blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter, remove it. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jianchao Wang >>>> --- >>>> ?? block/blk-mq-tag.c???? | 95 -------------------------------------------------- >>>> ?? include/linux/blk-mq.h |? 2 -- >>>> ?? 2 files changed, 97 deletions(-) >>>> >>> Please, don't. >>> >>> I'm currently implementing reserved commands for SCSI and reworking the SCSI error handling where I rely on >>> this interface quite heavily. >> >> >> blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter could access some stale requests which maybe freed due to io scheduler switching, >> request_queue cleanup (shared tagset) >> when there is someone submits io and gets driver tag. When io scheduler attached, even quiesce ^^^^ s/When/Without >> request_queue won't work. >> >> If this patchset is accepted, blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter could be replaced with blk_mq_queue_inflight_tag_iter >> which needs to be invoked by every request_queue that shares the tagset. >> > The point is, at that time I do _not_ have a request queue to work with. > > Most SCSI drivers have a host-wide shared tagset, which is used by all request queues on that host. > Iterating over the shared tagset is far more efficient than to traverse over all devices and the attached request queues. > > If I had to traverse all request queues I would need to add additional locking to ensure this traversal is race-free, making it a really cumbersome interface to use. Yes, the new interface int this patchset is indeed not convenient to use with shared tagset case. Perhaps we could introduce a interface to iterate all of the request_queue that shares a same tagset, such as, mutex_lock(&set->tag_list_lock) list_for_each_entry(q, &set->tag_list, tag_set_list) ... mutex_unlock(&set->tag_list_lock) > > Plus the tagset iter is understood to be used only in cases where I/O is stopped from the upper layers (ie no new I/O will be submitted). The window is during get driver tag and store the rq into tags->rqs[]. w/ io-scheduler attached, we need to quiesce the request_queue to stop the driver tag allocation attempts. w/o io-scheduler attached, quiesce request_queue cannot work, we need to freeze the queue and drain all of tasks that enters blk_mq_make_request to rule out all of attempts of allocating driver tags. Unfortunately, we cannot distinguish between the task entering .make_request and allocated requests both of which occupies q_usage_counter. So to stop all of the attmpts of allocating driver tag, we have freeze & drain and quiesce the request_queue. Thanks Jianchao > So here we only need to protect against I/O being completed, which is not what this patchset is about. > > So my objection still stands: Please, don't. > > Cheers, > > Hannes