From: "Liang He" <windhl@126.com>
To: james.smart@broadcom.com, hch@lst.de, sagi@grimberg.me,
kch@nvidia.com, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re:[PATCH] nvmet-fc: Fix potential Use-after-free bug in nvmet_fc_delete_target_queue()
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 09:46:59 +0800 (CST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5c965e81.13d6.183536d5bba.Coremail.windhl@126.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220916082953.4095940-1-windhl@126.com>
At 2022-09-16 16:29:53, "Liang He" <windhl@126.com> wrote:
>In nvmet_fc_delete_target_queue(), the nvmet_fc_tgt_q_put() may free
>queue if its refcount hits 0. And the following code will dereference
>it to get qclock by 'queue->qlock', so there is a potential UAF bug.
>
>Fixes: 619c62dcc62b ("nvmet-fc: correct ref counting error when deferred rcv used")
>Signed-off-by: Liang He <windhl@126.com>
>---
> drivers/nvme/target/fc.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/fc.c b/drivers/nvme/target/fc.c
>index ab2627e17bb9..32e1d62017d2 100644
>--- a/drivers/nvme/target/fc.c
>+++ b/drivers/nvme/target/fc.c
>@@ -881,6 +881,7 @@ nvmet_fc_delete_target_queue(struct nvmet_fc_tgt_queue *queue)
> struct nvmet_fc_tgtport *tgtport = queue->assoc->tgtport;
> struct nvmet_fc_fcp_iod *fod = queue->fod;
> struct nvmet_fc_defer_fcp_req *deferfcp, *tempptr;
>+ spinlock_t *q_lock = &queue->qlock;
> unsigned long flags;
> int i;
> bool disconnect;
>@@ -942,7 +943,7 @@ nvmet_fc_delete_target_queue(struct nvmet_fc_tgt_queue *queue)
>
> kfree(deferfcp);
>
>- spin_lock_irqsave(&queue->qlock, flags);
>+ spin_lock_irqsave(q_lock, flags);
> }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&queue->qlock, flags);
>
>--
>2.25.1
Sorry, my patch is totally wrong as the 'qlock' is embeded into queue.
So if queue is freed, the 'qlock' will also be freed.
Now, we can only hope the 'nvmet_fc_tgt_q_put' in lin 941 will never really free the 'queue'.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-19 1:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-16 8:29 [PATCH] nvmet-fc: Fix potential Use-after-free bug in nvmet_fc_delete_target_queue() Liang He
2022-09-16 18:09 ` James Smart
2022-09-19 1:46 ` Liang He [this message]
2022-09-19 17:57 ` James Smart
2022-09-20 12:54 ` Liang He
2022-09-20 15:53 ` James Smart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5c965e81.13d6.183536d5bba.Coremail.windhl@126.com \
--to=windhl@126.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox