From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
Cc: James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] nvme-fc: do not retry when auth fails or connection is refused
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 12:58:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d67a55e-e979-4c3c-8dcc-597cb13c7c9d@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <hxr2hztb64dank3jvbnrlciaebo4k2qkkrg3brhrppizeyelpo@ewupxurl7iqm>
On 2/22/24 18:02, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 08:45:04AM +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 07:46:12AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>> On 2/21/24 17:37, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 04:53:44PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>>> In this case yes, I've tested on top of this patch. This breaks the loop
>>>> where the provided key is invalid or is missing. The loop would happy
>>>> retry until reaching max of retries.
>>>
>>> But that's to be expected, no?
>>
>> Why? If the key is wrong/missing it will be likely wrong/missing the
>> next retry again. So what's the point in retrying?
>>
>>> After all, that's _precisely_ what
>>> NVME_SC_DNR is for;
>>> if you shouldn't retry, that bit is set.
>>> If it's not set, you should.
>>
>> Okay, in this case there is a bug in the auth code somewhere.
>
> With the change below nvme/041 also passes:
>
> modified drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.c
> @@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ int nvmf_connect_admin_queue(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
> if (result & NVME_CONNECT_AUTHREQ_ASCR) {
> dev_warn(ctrl->device,
> "qid 0: secure concatenation is not supported\n");
> - ret = NVME_SC_AUTH_REQUIRED;
> + ret = NVME_SC_AUTH_REQUIRED | NVME_SC_DNR;
> goto out_free_data;
> }
> /* Authentication required */
> @@ -475,7 +475,7 @@ int nvmf_connect_admin_queue(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
> if (ret) {
> dev_warn(ctrl->device,
> "qid 0: authentication setup failed\n");
> - ret = NVME_SC_AUTH_REQUIRED;
> + ret = NVME_SC_AUTH_REQUIRED | NVME_SC_DNR;
> goto out_free_data;
> }
> ret = nvme_auth_wait(ctrl, 0);
> @@ -540,8 +540,9 @@ int nvmf_connect_io_queue(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, u16 qid)
> /* Secure concatenation is not implemented */
> if (result & NVME_CONNECT_AUTHREQ_ASCR) {
> dev_warn(ctrl->device,
> - "qid 0: secure concatenation is not supported\n");
> - ret = NVME_SC_AUTH_REQUIRED;
> + "qid %d: secure concatenation is not supported\n",
> + qid);
> + ret = NVME_SC_AUTH_REQUIRED | NVME_SC_DNR;
> goto out_free_data;
> }
> /* Authentication required */
> @@ -549,7 +550,7 @@ int nvmf_connect_io_queue(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, u16 qid)
> if (ret) {
> dev_warn(ctrl->device,
> "qid %d: authentication setup failed\n", qid);
> - ret = NVME_SC_AUTH_REQUIRED;
> + ret = NVME_SC_AUTH_REQUIRED | NVME_SC_DNR;
> } else {
> ret = nvme_auth_wait(ctrl, qid);
> if (ret)
>
> Is this what you had in mind?
Which, incidentally, is basically the patch I just posted.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-23 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-21 13:23 [PATCH v2 0/5] nvme-fc: fix blktests nvme/041 Daniel Wagner
2024-02-21 13:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] nvme-fc: rename free_ctrl callback to match name pattern Daniel Wagner
2024-02-21 15:52 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-03-07 10:21 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-02-21 13:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] nvme-fc: do not retry when auth fails or connection is refused Daniel Wagner
2024-02-21 15:53 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-02-21 16:37 ` Daniel Wagner
2024-02-22 6:46 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-02-22 7:45 ` Daniel Wagner
2024-02-22 17:02 ` Daniel Wagner
2024-02-23 11:58 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2024-03-07 10:25 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-03-07 12:43 ` Daniel Wagner
2024-02-21 13:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] nvme-fabrics: introduce ref counting for nvmf_ctrl_options Daniel Wagner
2024-02-21 15:54 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-03-07 10:27 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-03-11 17:36 ` Daniel Wagner
2024-03-11 19:28 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-02-21 13:24 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] nvme-fc: reorder ctrl ref counting and cleanup code path Daniel Wagner
2024-02-21 13:24 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] nvme-fc: wait for initial connect attempt to finish Daniel Wagner
2024-03-07 10:33 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-02-21 18:04 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] nvme-fc: fix blktests nvme/041 Keith Busch
2024-03-06 14:35 ` Daniel Wagner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5d67a55e-e979-4c3c-8dcc-597cb13c7c9d@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=dwagner@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox