From: axboe@kernel.dk (Jens Axboe)
Subject: nvme: batch completions and do them outside of the queue lock
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 16:57:56 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5e2e6da5-70ca-5b32-d02a-04baf2df1e9a@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180516223538.GE20223@localhost.localdomain>
On 5/16/18 4:35 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2018@03:27:57PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
>> On Wed, May 16, 2018@02:37:40PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> This patch splits up the reaping of completion entries, and the
>>> block side completion. The advantage of this is two-fold:
>>>
>>> 1) We can batch completions, this patch pulls them off in units
>>> of 8, but that number is fairly arbitrary. I wanted it to be
>>> big enough to hold most use cases, but not big enough to be
>>> a stack burden.
>>>
>>> 2) We complete the block side of things outside of the queue lock.
>>
>> Interesting idea. Since you bring this up, I think there may be more
>> optimizations on top of this concept. I'll stare at this a bit before
>> applying, or may have a follow-up proposal later.
>
> While I'm not seeing a difference, I assume you are. I tried adding on
> to this proposal by batching *all* completions without using the stack,
> exploiting the fact we never wrap the queue so it can be accessed
> lockless after moving the cq_head.
That looks nifty.
> + *start = nvmeq->cq_head;
> + while (nvme_read_cqe(nvmeq));
Probably want to make that
*start = nvmeq->cq_head;
while (nvme_read_cqe(nvmeq))
;
so it doesn't look like a misplaced ;.
Apart from that, looks pretty clean to me. Haven't tested it yet.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-16 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-16 20:37 nvme: batch completions and do them outside of the queue lock Jens Axboe
2018-05-16 21:27 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-16 22:35 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-16 22:57 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2018-05-16 23:10 ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-16 23:18 ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-16 23:39 ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-17 2:09 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-17 3:16 ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-17 3:16 ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-17 7:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-17 7:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5e2e6da5-70ca-5b32-d02a-04baf2df1e9a@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).