linux-nvme.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: axboe@kernel.dk (Jens Axboe)
Subject: nvme: batch completions and do them outside of the queue lock
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 16:57:56 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5e2e6da5-70ca-5b32-d02a-04baf2df1e9a@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180516223538.GE20223@localhost.localdomain>

On 5/16/18 4:35 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2018@03:27:57PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
>> On Wed, May 16, 2018@02:37:40PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> This patch splits up the reaping of completion entries, and the
>>> block side completion. The advantage of this is two-fold:
>>>
>>> 1) We can batch completions, this patch pulls them off in units
>>>    of 8, but that number is fairly arbitrary. I wanted it to be
>>>    big enough to hold most use cases, but not big enough to be
>>>    a stack burden.
>>>
>>> 2) We complete the block side of things outside of the queue lock.
>>
>> Interesting idea. Since you bring this up, I think there may be more
>> optimizations on top of this concept. I'll stare at this a bit before
>> applying, or may have a follow-up proposal later.
> 
> While I'm not seeing a difference, I assume you are. I tried adding on
> to this proposal by batching *all* completions without using the stack,
> exploiting the fact we never wrap the queue so it can be accessed
> lockless after moving the cq_head.

That looks nifty.

> +	*start = nvmeq->cq_head;
> +	while (nvme_read_cqe(nvmeq));

Probably want to make that

	*start = nvmeq->cq_head;
	while (nvme_read_cqe(nvmeq))
		;

so it doesn't look like a misplaced ;.

Apart from that, looks pretty clean to me. Haven't tested it yet.
 
-- 
Jens Axboe

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-16 22:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-16 20:37 nvme: batch completions and do them outside of the queue lock Jens Axboe
2018-05-16 21:27 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-16 22:35   ` Keith Busch
2018-05-16 22:57     ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2018-05-16 23:10       ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-16 23:18         ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-16 23:39           ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-17  2:09             ` Keith Busch
2018-05-17  3:16               ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-17  3:16               ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-17  7:16             ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-17  7:51     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5e2e6da5-70ca-5b32-d02a-04baf2df1e9a@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).