[PATCH v2 0/4] arbitrary sg lists support

[loberman@redhat.com (Laurence Oberman)]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Max Gurtovoy" <maxg at mellanox.com>
> To: "Doug Ledford" <dledford at redhat.com>, "Sagi Grimberg" <sagi at grimberg.me>, "Leon Romanovsky" <leon at kernel.org>
> Cc: "Bart Van Assche" <Bart.VanAssche at sandisk.com>, hch at lst.de, "keith busch" <keith.busch at intel.com>,
> linux-nvme at lists.infradead.org, linux-rdma at vger.kernel.org, vladimirk at mellanox.com
> Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 12:14:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] arbitrary sg lists support
> 
> 
> 
> On 5/1/2017 9:50 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > On Sun, 2017-04-23@17:35 +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I actually answered here:
> >>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg46412.html
> >>
> >> Did anything progress with the debug?
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Sagi,
> >>> As you mentioned the IO path is different in SRP and iSER so IMO we
> >>> should start with SRP debugging. NVMf is similar to iSER (and not
> >>> SRP)
> >>> and that's why I think we can apply this patchset.
> >>
> >> My concern is that this might be broken due to the fact that we don't
> >> know what triggers this.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> If you want to wait till we debug SRP issue it's fine, but I can't
> >>> repro
> >>> it in my lab so it can take longer.
> >>
> >> I'd prefer not to take a non-mandatory feature that is not guaranteed
> >> to work.
> >
> > Indeed.  I've left this series on hold (actually, I've removed it from
> > patchworks).  When we get this straightened, then please resubmit.
> >
> 
> Sure, no problem.
> 
> Max.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

Max
The setup is in place, send me whatever it is you need for debug here.
Patches, instrumentation etc.
I will be happy to gather the debug.
Regards
Laurence