public inbox for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
To: Daniel Wagner <wagi@kernel.org>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] blk-mq: fix wait condition for tagset wait completed check
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 15:24:52 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <669a9e1c-bde2-4323-b997-cdbd82a26eab@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250128-nvme-misc-fixes-v1-3-40c586581171@kernel.org>



On 1/28/25 10:04 PM, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> blk_mq_tagset_count_completed_reqs returns the number of completed
> requests. The only user of this function is
> blk_mq_tagset_wait_completed_request which wants to know how many
> request are not yet completed. Thus return the number of in flight
> requests and terminate the wait loop when there is no inflight request.
> 
> Fixes: f9934a80f91d ("blk-mq: introduce blk_mq_tagset_wait_completed_request()")
> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <wagi@kernel.org>
> ---
>  block/blk-mq-tag.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> index b9f417d980b46d54b74dec8adcb5b04e6a78635c..3ce46afb65e3c3de9f11ca440bf0f335f21d0998 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> @@ -450,11 +450,11 @@ void blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(struct blk_mq_tag_set *tagset,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter);
>  
> -static bool blk_mq_tagset_count_completed_rqs(struct request *rq, void *data)
> +static bool blk_mq_tagset_count_inflight_rqs(struct request *rq, void *data)
>  {
>  	unsigned *count = data;
>  
> -	if (blk_mq_request_completed(rq))
> +	if (blk_mq_rq_state(rq) == MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT)
>  		(*count)++;
>  	return true;
>  }
> @@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ void blk_mq_tagset_wait_completed_request(struct blk_mq_tag_set *tagset)
>  		unsigned count = 0;
>  
>  		blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(tagset,
> -				blk_mq_tagset_count_completed_rqs, &count);
> +				blk_mq_tagset_count_inflight_rqs, &count);
>  		if (!count)
>  			break;
>  		msleep(5);
> 
I see that blk_mq_tagset_wait_completed_request() is called from nvme_cancel_tagset()
and nvme_cancel_admin_tagset(). And it seems to me that the intention here's to wait 
until each completed requests are freed (or change its state to MQ_RQ_IDLE). 

Looking at code, the nvme_cancel_xxx() first invokes blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter() which 
iterates through tagset and cancels each in-flight request and marks the request state
to MQ_RQ_COMPLETE. Next in blk_mq_tagset_wait_completed_request(), we wait for each
completed request state changed to anything but MQ_RQ_COMPLETE. The next state of the 
request would be naturally MQ_RQ_IDLE once that request is freed. So in blk_mq_tagset_
wait_completed_request(), essentially we wait for request state change from MQ_RQ_COMPLETE
to MQ_RQ_IDLE.

So now if the proposal is that blk_mq_tagset_wait_completed_request() has to wait only 
if there's any in-flight request then it seems this function would never need to wait 
and looks redundant because req->state would never be MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT as those would 
have been already changed to MQ_RQ_COMPLETE when nvme_cancel_xxx() invokes blk_mq_tagset_
busy_iter(ctrl->tagset, nvme_cancel_request, ctrl).

Having said that, I am not sure what was the real intention here, in nvme_cancel_xxx(), 
do we really need to wait only until in-flight requests are completed or synchronize with 
request's completion callback (i.e. wait until all completed requests are freed)? 

Thanks,
--Nilay


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-01-29  9:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-28 16:34 [PATCH 0/3] misc nvme related fixes Daniel Wagner
2025-01-28 16:34 ` [PATCH 1/3] nvme-tcp: rate limit error message in send path Daniel Wagner
2025-01-29  6:05   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-30 15:25     ` Daniel Wagner
2025-01-31  7:29       ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-31  8:09         ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-01-31  8:09   ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-01-28 16:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] nvme-fc: use ctrl state getter Daniel Wagner
2025-01-29  6:05   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-29 18:39   ` Keith Busch
2025-01-31  8:09   ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-01-28 16:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] blk-mq: fix wait condition for tagset wait completed check Daniel Wagner
2025-01-29  6:07   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-29  9:54   ` Nilay Shroff [this message]
2025-01-31  8:13   ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-01-31  8:46     ` Daniel Wagner
2025-01-31  8:54       ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=669a9e1c-bde2-4323-b997-cdbd82a26eab@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=wagi@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox