From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mr.nuke.me@gmail.com (Alex G.) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 09:19:13 -0500 Subject: IRQ/nvme_pci_complete_rq: NULL pointer dereference yet again In-Reply-To: <20180409194713.GA6283@localhost.localdomain> References: <20180406153236.GK10098@localhost.localdomain> <94d77cb7-759f-595a-2264-37305dfa96c4@gmail.com> <20180406171622.aso3h6ydpmcdizl3@sbauer-Z170X-UD5> <93003ab7-f4a0-7e5d-f107-277df20f5566@gmail.com> <20180406180445.GL10098@localhost.localdomain> <20180406220058.GN10098@localhost.localdomain> <64cb047e-aa2b-2693-643a-6dac6eba2487@gmail.com> <20180409191109.GP10098@localhost.localdomain> <20180409194713.GA6283@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <686d97b2-1a15-d6a9-110c-a17fb9e1ab1b@gmail.com> On 04/09/2018 02:47 PM, Keith Busch wrote: > On Mon, Apr 09, 2018@02:36:30PM -0500, Alex G. wrote: >> Although I remember a time when I could run these sort of tests without >> panic(), I don't have a solid base from which I can bisect things. >> Especially since we've added a few fixes lately that won't be in any base. >> >> I'll try a couple of branches, but don't hold your breath. > > This may be a regression. Your panic is triggered through the timeout > path, which appears to have had recent modifications that are included > in your kernel. There's at least one issue in this area: > > https://marc.info/?l=linux-block&m=152325124306821&w=2 This change appears to fix the NULL dereference. > I haven't looked into it enough to know if it's related to this issue, > though. >