Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Khazhy Kumykov <khazhy@google.com>,
	Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	David Jeffery <djeffery@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] blk-mq: grab rq->refcount before calling ->fn in blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 11:55:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6c0b0af9-ca71-d143-b1cc-384adfca5438@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210425085753.2617424-8-ming.lei@redhat.com>

On 4/25/21 1:57 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> However, still one request UAF not covered: refcount_inc_not_zero() may
> read one freed request, and it will be handled in next patch.

This means that patch "blk-mq: clear stale request in tags->rq[] before
freeing one request pool" should come before this patch.

> @@ -276,12 +277,15 @@ static bool bt_tags_iter(struct sbitmap *bitmap, unsigned int bitnr, void *data)
>  		rq = tags->static_rqs[bitnr];
>  	else
>  		rq = tags->rqs[bitnr];
> -	if (!rq)
> +	if (!rq || !refcount_inc_not_zero(&rq->ref))
>  		return true;
>  	if ((iter_data->flags & BT_TAG_ITER_STARTED) &&
>  	    !blk_mq_request_started(rq))
> -		return true;
> -	return iter_data->fn(rq, iter_data->data, reserved);
> +		ret = true;
> +	else
> +		ret = iter_data->fn(rq, iter_data->data, reserved);
> +	blk_mq_put_rq_ref(rq);
> +	return ret;
>  }

Even if patches 7/8 and 8/8 would be reordered, the above code
introduces a new use-after-free, a use-after-free that is much worse
than the UAF in kernel v5.11. The following sequence can be triggered by
the above code:
* bt_tags_iter() reads tags->rqs[bitnr] and stores the request pointer
in the 'rq' variable.
* Request 'rq' completes, tags->rqs[bitnr] is cleared and the memory
that backs that request is freed.
* The memory that backs 'rq' is used for another purpose and the request
reference count becomes nonzero.
* bt_tags_iter() increments the request reference count and thereby
corrupts memory.

Bart.

_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-25 18:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-25  8:57 [PATCH 0/8] blk-mq: fix request UAF related with iterating over tagset requests Ming Lei
2021-04-25  8:57 ` [PATCH 1/8] Revert "blk-mq: Fix races between blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues() and iterating over tags" Ming Lei
2021-04-25  8:57 ` [PATCH 2/8] Revert "blk-mq: Make it safe to use RCU to iterate over blk_mq_tag_set.tag_list" Ming Lei
2021-04-25  8:57 ` [PATCH 3/8] Revert "blk-mq: Fix races between iterating over requests and freeing requests" Ming Lei
2021-04-25  8:57 ` [PATCH 4/8] Revert "blk-mq: Introduce atomic variants of blk_mq_(all_tag|tagset_busy)_iter" Ming Lei
2021-04-25  8:57 ` [PATCH 5/8] blk-mq: blk_mq_complete_request_locally Ming Lei
2021-04-25  8:57 ` [PATCH 6/8] block: drivers: complete request locally from blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter Ming Lei
2021-04-26  3:02   ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-26  6:24     ` Ming Lei
2021-04-27  8:54       ` Ming Lei
2021-04-25  8:57 ` [PATCH 7/8] blk-mq: grab rq->refcount before calling ->fn in blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter Ming Lei
2021-04-25 18:55   ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2021-04-26  0:41     ` Ming Lei
2021-04-25  8:57 ` [PATCH 8/8] blk-mq: clear stale request in tags->rq[] before freeing one request pool Ming Lei
2021-04-25 20:42   ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-26  0:49     ` Ming Lei
2021-04-26  1:50       ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-26  2:07         ` Ming Lei
2021-04-25  9:27 ` [PATCH 0/8] blk-mq: fix request UAF related with iterating over tagset requests Ming Lei
2021-04-25 20:53   ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-26  1:19     ` Ming Lei
2021-04-26  1:57       ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-25 16:17 ` Jens Axboe
2021-04-25 18:39   ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-25 20:18     ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6c0b0af9-ca71-d143-b1cc-384adfca5438@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=djeffery@redhat.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=khazhy@google.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox