From: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
To: Guixin Liu <kanie@linux.alibaba.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] nvmet: return Invalid Field for invalid NSIDs in Get Features 82h
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2026 16:54:51 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6cd61a1c-d585-4b5c-b72e-2dd11ce07279@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260920033500.3209138-3-kanie@linux.alibaba.com>
On 9/20/26 9:05 AM, Guixin Liu wrote:
> The Reservation Notification Mask feature (FID 82h) rejects the same
> NSIDs for Get Features as for Set Features, plus the broadcast NSID:
>
> "A Get Features command that uses a namespace ID of FFFFFFFFh
> shall be aborted with status code of Invalid Field in Command.
> If a Set Features command or a Get Features command attempts to
> access the Reservation Notification Mask on a namespace that does
> not support reservations or is invalid, then that command is
> aborted with status code of Invalid Field in Command."
>
> -- NVMe Base Specification, section 5.2.26.1.33
>
> The Get Features handler routes the namespace lookup through
> nvmet_req_find_ns(), which returns Invalid Namespace or Format for an
> unknown NSID. Both rejected cases land there: a nonexistent NSID
> fails the lookup, and so does the broadcast NSID, which never names a
> namespace. Both are aborted with Invalid Namespace or Format instead
> of Invalid Field in Command.
>
> Translate the lookup failure to Invalid Field in Command, as was done
> for Set Features.
>
> Fixes: 5a47c2080a73 ("nvmet: support reservation feature")
> Signed-off-by: Guixin Liu<kanie@linux.alibaba.com>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-25 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-20 3:34 [PATCH v2 0/2] nvmet: fix FID 82h status codes for invalid NSIDs Guixin Liu
2026-09-20 3:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] nvmet: return Invalid Field for invalid NSIDs in Set Features 82h Guixin Liu
2026-09-20 11:07 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-09-21 6:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-21 7:56 ` Guixin Liu
2026-09-21 8:24 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-09-25 7:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-25 11:24 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-09-20 3:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] nvmet: return Invalid Field for invalid NSIDs in Get " Guixin Liu
2026-09-25 7:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-25 11:24 ` Nilay Shroff [this message]
2026-10-03 8:54 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] nvmet: fix FID 82h status codes for invalid NSIDs Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6cd61a1c-d585-4b5c-b72e-2dd11ce07279@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dwagner@suse.de \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=kanie@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox