Re: [PATCH v1] blk-mq: add one blk_mq_req_flags_t type to support mq ctx fallback

[Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>]

On 21/10/2024 17:36, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 02:30:01PM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 21/10/2024 11:31, Ming Lei wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 10:05:34AM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 21/10/2024 4:39, Ming Lei wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 10:40:41PM +0800, zhuxiaohui wrote:
>>>>>> From: Zhu Xiaohui <zhuxiaohui.400@bytedance.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is observed that nvme connect to a nvme over fabric target will
>>>>>> always fail when 'nohz_full' is set.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In commit a46c27026da1 ("blk-mq: don't schedule block kworker on
>>>>>> isolated CPUs"), it clears hctx->cpumask for all isolate CPUs,
>>>>>> and when nvme connect to a remote target, it may fails on this stack:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>            blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx+1
>>>>>>            __nvme_submit_sync_cmd+106
>>>>>>            nvmf_connect_io_queue+181
>>>>>>            nvme_tcp_start_queue+293
>>>>>>            nvme_tcp_setup_ctrl+948
>>>>>>            nvme_tcp_create_ctrl+735
>>>>>>            nvmf_dev_write+532
>>>>>>            vfs_write+237
>>>>>>            ksys_write+107
>>>>>>            do_syscall_64+128
>>>>>>            entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+118
>>>>>>
>>>>>> due to that the given blk_mq_hw_ctx->cpumask is cleared with no available
>>>>>> blk_mq_ctx on the hw queue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This patch introduce a new blk_mq_req_flags_t flag 'BLK_MQ_REQ_ARB_MQ'
>>>>>> as well as a nvme_submit_flags_t 'NVME_SUBMIT_ARB_MQ' which are used to
>>>>>> indicate that block layer can fallback to a  blk_mq_ctx whose cpu
>>>>>> is not isolated.
>>>>> blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx()
>>>>> 	...
>>>>> 	cpu = cpumask_first_and(data.hctx->cpumask, cpu_online_mask);
>>>>> 	...
>>>>>
>>>>> It can happen in case of non-cpu-isolation too, such as when this hctx hasn't
>>>>> online CPUs, both are same actually from this viewpoint.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is one long-time problem for nvme fc.
>>>> For what nvmf is using blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx() is not important. It just
>>>> needs a tag from that hctx. the request execution is running where
>>>> blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx() is running.
>>> I am afraid that just one tag from the specified hw queue isn't enough.
>>>
>>> The connection request needs to be issued to the hw queue & completed.
>>> Without any online CPU for this hw queue, the request can't be completed
>>> in case of managed-irq.
>> None of the consumers of this API use managed-irqs. the networking stack
>> takes care of steering irq vectors to online cpus.
> OK, it looks not necessary to AND with cpu_online_mask in
> blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx, and the behavior is actually from commit
> 20e4d8139319 ("blk-mq: simplify queue mapping & schedule with each possisble CPU").

it is a long time ago...

>
> But it is still too tricky as one API, please look at blk_mq_get_tag(), which may
> allocate tag from other hw queue, instead of the specified one.

I don't see how it can help here.

>
> It is just lucky for connection request because IO isn't started
> yet at that time, and the allocation always succeeds in the 1st try of
> __blk_mq_get_tag().

It's not lucky, we reserve a per-queue tag for exactly this flow 
(connect) so we
always have one available. And when the connect is running, the driver 
should
guarantee nothing else is running.