From: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
To: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>,
kbusch@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, sagi@grimberg.me, hare@suse.de,
dwagner@suse.de
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] nvme-tcp: teardown circular lockng fixes
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2026 20:53:07 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <717bbe4d-d0ac-46b7-b609-a0389900e220@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260226025658.86496-1-kch@nvidia.com>
On 2/26/26 8:26 AM, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> When a controller reset is triggered via sysfs (by writing to
> sys/class/nvme<nvmedev>/reset_controller), the reset work tears down
> and re-establishes all queues. The socket release using fput() defers
> the actual cleanup to task_work delayed_fput workqueue. This deferred
> cleanup can race with the subsequent queue re-allocation during reset,
> potentially leading to use-after-free or resource conflicts.
>
> Replace fput() with __fput_sync() to ensure synchronous socket release,
> guaranteeing that all socket resources are fully cleaned up before the
> function returns. This prevents races during controller reset where
> new queue setup may begin before the old socket is fully released.
>
> * Call chain during reset:
> nvme_reset_ctrl_work()
> -> nvme_tcp_teardown_ctrl()
> -> nvme_tcp_teardown_io_queues()
> -> nvme_tcp_free_io_queues()
> -> nvme_tcp_free_queue() <-- fput() -> __fput_sync()
> -> nvme_tcp_teardown_admin_queue()
> -> nvme_tcp_free_admin_queue()
> -> nvme_tcp_free_queue() <-- fput() -> __fput_sync()
> -> nvme_tcp_setup_ctrl() <-- race with deferred fput
>
> memalloc_noreclaim_save() sets PF_MEMALLOC which is intended for tasks
> performing memory reclaim work that need reserve access. While PF_MEMALLOC
> prevents the task from entering direct reclaim (causing __need_reclaim() to
> return false), it does not strip __GFP_IO from gfp flags. The allocator can
> therefore still trigger writeback I/O when __GFP_IO remains set, which is
> unsafe when the caller holds block layer locks.
>
> Switch to memalloc_noio_save() which sets PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO. This causes
> current_gfp_context() to strip __GFP_IO|__GFP_FS from every allocation in
> the scope, making it safe to allocate memory while holding elevator_lock and
> set->srcu.
>
[...]
>
> Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
> ---
Looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-26 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-26 2:56 [PATCH V3] nvme-tcp: teardown circular lockng fixes Chaitanya Kulkarni
2026-02-26 15:23 ` Nilay Shroff [this message]
2026-02-27 7:56 ` Daniel Wagner
2026-02-27 23:12 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2026-03-10 5:45 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=717bbe4d-d0ac-46b7-b609-a0389900e220@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dwagner@suse.de \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox