From: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Cc: dwagner@suse.de, kbusch@kernel.org, gjoyce@ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/4] nvme: support <device> option in show-topology command
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 10:13:42 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <742adb3b-6441-43f2-a1cd-c19b55d97ec4@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <39506d0c-9205-4638-a516-0cfe0de9a8ff@suse.de>
On 8/18/25 12:42 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 8/12/25 14:56, Nilay Shroff wrote:
>> Although the help text for the nvme show-topology command indicates
>> support for a <device> option, this option has no effect in practice
>> — specifying an NVMe device name does not filter the output.
>>
>> This commit adds proper support for the <device> option, enabling users
>> to filter the topology output based on the specified NVMe device.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> nvme-print-stdout.c | 9 +++++++++
>> nvme.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/nvme-print-stdout.c b/nvme-print-stdout.c
>> index c597b608..eb56349a 100644
>> --- a/nvme-print-stdout.c
>> +++ b/nvme-print-stdout.c
>> @@ -5683,6 +5683,15 @@ static void stdout_simple_topology(nvme_root_t r,
>> nvme_for_each_host(r, h) {
>> nvme_for_each_subsystem(h, s) {
>> + bool no_ctrl = true;
>> + nvme_ctrl_t c;
>> +
>> + nvme_subsystem_for_each_ctrl(s, c)
>> + no_ctrl = false;
>> +
>> + if (no_ctrl)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> if (!first)
>> printf("\n");
>> first = false;
>> diff --git a/nvme.c b/nvme.c
>> index 27dac37b..c6779cf4 100644
>> --- a/nvme.c
>> +++ b/nvme.c
>> @@ -10155,6 +10155,8 @@ static int show_topology_cmd(int argc, char **argv, struct command *command, str
>> const char *ranking = "Ranking order: namespace|ctrl";
>> nvme_print_flags_t flags;
>> _cleanup_nvme_root_ nvme_root_t r = NULL;
>> + char *devname = NULL;
>> + nvme_scan_filter_t filter = NULL;
>> enum nvme_cli_topo_ranking rank;
>> int err;
>> @@ -10197,7 +10199,20 @@ static int show_topology_cmd(int argc, char **argv, struct command *command, str
>> return -errno;
>> }
>> - err = nvme_scan_topology(r, NULL, NULL);
>> + if (optind < argc)
>> + devname = basename(argv[optind++]);
>> +
>> + if (devname) {
>> + int subsys_id, nsid;
>> +
>> + if (sscanf(devname, "nvme%dn%d", &subsys_id, &nsid) != 2) {
>> + nvme_show_error("Invalid device name %s\n", devname);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> + filter = nvme_match_device_filter;
>> + }
>> +
>> + err = nvme_scan_topology(r, filter, (void *)devname);
>> if (err < 0) {
>> nvme_show_error("Failed to scan topology: %s", nvme_strerror(errno));
>> return err;
>
> While I welcome this change, we've had discussions that
> 'nvme show-topology <device>' really should _not_ print out
> anything if the device does not exist.
> Have you checked this for your patch?
>
Yes I checked that. If <device> doesn't exist then
nvme show-topology would print nothing.
Thanks,
--Nilay
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-19 4:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-12 12:56 [PATCHv2 0/4] nvme-cli: enhance the visibility of multipath using show-topology command Nilay Shroff
2025-08-12 12:56 ` [PATCHv2 1/4] nvme: support <device> option in " Nilay Shroff
2025-08-18 7:12 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-08-19 4:43 ` Nilay Shroff [this message]
2025-08-19 6:11 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-08-12 12:56 ` [PATCHv2 2/4] nvme: extend show-topology command to add support for multipath Nilay Shroff
2025-08-18 7:22 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-08-19 4:49 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-08-19 6:15 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-08-19 10:31 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-08-19 11:05 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-08-19 11:30 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-08-20 8:17 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-08-20 8:30 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-08-20 11:59 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-09-01 9:21 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-09-01 16:36 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-09-02 6:26 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-09-03 4:22 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-09-03 7:24 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-09-03 12:19 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-08-12 12:56 ` [PATCHv2 3/4] nvme: add common APIs for printing tabular format output Nilay Shroff
2025-08-18 7:27 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-08-19 8:56 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-08-20 8:23 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-08-12 12:56 ` [PATCHv2 4/4] nvme: add support for printing show-topology in tabular form Nilay Shroff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=742adb3b-6441-43f2-a1cd-c19b55d97ec4@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dwagner@suse.de \
--cc=gjoyce@ibm.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).