From: swise@opengridcomputing.com (Steve Wise)
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/3] nvmet-rdma: support max(16KB, PAGE_SIZE) inline data
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 09:35:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <75a24870-832c-1a4c-fe97-c1dfcf91c426@opengridcomputing.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <98819370-459b-cad8-e89e-e2a128178dba@grimberg.me>
On 6/19/2018 6:59 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
>
> On 06/05/2018 08:16 PM, Steve Wise wrote:
>> The patch enables inline data sizes using up to 4 recv sges, and capping
>> the size at 16KB or at least 1 page size.
>
> Question: any reason for that cap? Just seems like an arbitrary limit...
>
It was there in the original patch series, and I continued it.? I guess
the idea is we don't want to be a memory hog.
> ? So on a 4K page system, up to
>> 16KB is supported, and for a 64K page system 1 page of 64KB is
>> supported.
>
> Well if someone asked for 16K and got 64K its a bit of a surprise
> isn't it? without exposing knob for this, using 64K OK I guess, but when
> we expose controls for this its a bit surprising.
>
I'm open to proposals for a better way to do all this.? Like perhaps
just a knob for how many pages to allow?
> Would page_frags work better here? (page_frag_alloc/page_frag_free)
> Given that most likely the backend device will work with 4K pages, the
> fragments won't cause gaps...
>
There's no comments on this API.? How does it work?? It allocates some
number of contiguous fragments < a page?
> Thoughts?
>
> ...
>
>
>> +static int num_pages(int len)
>> +{
>> +??? return 1 + (((len - 1) & PAGE_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>> +}
>
> Steve, can you explain why is this needed? why isn't get_order()
> sufficient?
>
I thought get_order() gives you a power of two >= the length. ie 1, 2,
4, 8, 16.? For inline_data length of 12KB, for example, we want 3 pages,
not 4.? Or am I mistaken?
Steve.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-19 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-05 17:22 [PATCH v4 0/3] NVMF/RDMA 16K Inline Support Steve Wise
2018-06-05 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] nvme-rdma: correctly check for target keyed sgl support Steve Wise
2018-06-06 12:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-05 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] nvme-rdma: support up to 4 segments of inline data Steve Wise
2018-06-05 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] nvmet-rdma: support max(16KB, PAGE_SIZE) " Steve Wise
2018-06-06 9:24 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-06-07 19:53 ` Steve Wise
2018-06-19 11:59 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-06-19 14:35 ` Steve Wise [this message]
2018-06-19 19:29 ` Steve Wise
2018-06-18 14:49 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] NVMF/RDMA 16K Inline Support Steve Wise
2018-06-18 15:18 ` Steve Wise
2018-06-19 5:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-19 9:21 ` Max Gurtovoy
2018-06-19 14:41 ` Steve Wise
2018-06-19 16:02 ` Steve Wise
2018-06-19 17:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-06-20 8:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-20 14:02 ` Steve Wise
2018-06-20 18:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=75a24870-832c-1a4c-fe97-c1dfcf91c426@opengridcomputing.com \
--to=swise@opengridcomputing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox