From: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
To: Saravanan D <saravanand@crusoe.ai>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
dwagner@suse.de, hare@suse.de, sagi@grimberg.me,
kbusch@kernel.org, iyamahata@crusoe.ai, kiyer@crusoe.ai,
ganbalagane@crusoe.ai, sjpark@crusoe.ai, bchen@crusoe.ai
Subject: Re: [PATCH blktests] nvme/081: test the per-queue io_cpu sysfs attribute
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2026 19:13:27 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7a2bcf1c-990f-46fa-badd-dc1b14dfa96f@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261107095350.98072-1-saravanand@crusoe.ai>
On 11/7/26 3:23 PM, Saravanan D wrote:
> +test() {
> + echo "Running ${TEST_NAME}"
> +
> + _setup_nvmet
> +
> + local cfs_path="${NVMET_CFS}/subsystems/${def_subsysnqn}"
> + local skipped=false
> + local nvmedev qdir cpu writer
> +
> + _nvmet_target_setup --blkdev file
> +
> + _nvme_connect_subsys --keep-alive-tmo 1 --reconnect-delay 2
How about adding connection option "--nr-io-queues 2"? If we add
this option then we may not need to have the requirement of
_require_min_cpus 2. I think, we shall be able to run this test
also on the system with only one cpu.
> + _nvmf_wait_for_state "${def_subsysnqn}" "live"
> + nvmedev=$(_find_nvme_dev "${def_subsysnqn}")
> + qdir="/sys/class/nvme/${nvmedev}/queues"
> + cpu=$(last_online_cpu)
> +
Can we also add one more test here which tests whether "$qdir"
exists or not?
> + if [[ ! -f "${qdir}/1/io_cpu" ]]; then
> + SKIP_REASONS+=("missing per-queue io_cpu attribute")
> + skipped=true
> + elif [[ "$(nr_queue_dirs "${nvmedev}")" -lt 2 ]]; then
> + SKIP_REASONS+=("controller has fewer than 2 I/O queues")
> + skipped=true
I think using --nr-io-queues option would also replace the above relative
comparison with an exact comparison based on num of queues selected.
> + else
> + test_read_write "${qdir}" "${cpu}"
> + test_reset "${nvmedev}" "${qdir}" "${cpu}"
The reset test could be updated to ensure that number of queues
remains unchanged after controller reset. Current test_reset()
verifies that the io_cpu and managed attributes retain their expected
values after reset. However, it doesn't explicitly verify that the
queue directories were recreated with the same count. I would capture
the queue_count before reset and compare it afterward as well as
ensure that queue_count matches with nr_queue_dirs.
Thanks,
--Nilay
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-07 9:53 [PATCH v8 0/2] nvme-tcp: allow setting per-queue io_cpu through sysfs Saravanan D
2026-11-07 9:53 ` [PATCH v8 1/2] nvme: add per-queue sysfs directories Saravanan D
2026-11-09 11:27 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-11-10 13:06 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-11-07 9:53 ` [PATCH v8 2/2] nvme-tcp: allow setting per-queue io_cpu through sysfs Saravanan D
2026-11-09 11:40 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-11-10 13:09 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-11-07 9:53 ` [PATCH blktests] nvme/081: test the per-queue io_cpu sysfs attribute Saravanan D
2026-11-09 13:43 ` Nilay Shroff [this message]
2026-11-10 11:49 ` Saravanan D
2026-11-10 11:50 ` [PATCH blktests v2] " Saravanan D
2026-11-11 8:47 ` Nilay Shroff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7a2bcf1c-990f-46fa-badd-dc1b14dfa96f@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bchen@crusoe.ai \
--cc=dwagner@suse.de \
--cc=ganbalagane@crusoe.ai \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=iyamahata@crusoe.ai \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kiyer@crusoe.ai \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=saravanand@crusoe.ai \
--cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
--cc=sjpark@crusoe.ai \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox