From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: logang@deltatee.com (Logan Gunthorpe)
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 12:05:57 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 06/12] IB/core: Add optional PCI P2P flag to
 rdma_rw_ctx_[init|destroy]()
In-Reply-To: <20180108185743.GA15936@lst.de>
References: <20180104190137.7654-7-logang@deltatee.com>
 <20180104192225.GS11348@ziepe.ca>
 <1f8fb3fb-e3dc-94d3-e837-0cd942cf5b87@deltatee.com>
 <20180104221337.GV11348@ziepe.ca>
 <3e8391a9-8924-be6d-8c43-162a360d75b6@deltatee.com>
 <20180105045031.GX11348@ziepe.ca> <20180108145901.GA10743@lst.de>
 <20180108180917.GF11348@ziepe.ca> <20180108183434.GA15549@lst.de>
 <cffacbee-477a-fbe9-19cc-373cd2ec6fef@deltatee.com>
 <20180108185743.GA15936@lst.de>
Message-ID: <7d276107-d2ae-530b-3d56-e104e22b4eea@deltatee.com>



On 08/01/18 11:57 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> It does, sort of - but in a different way then the normal DMA map
> ops.  And only to work around the fact that we need to map our
> P2P space into struct pages.  Without that we could just pass the
> bus address around, but the Linux stack and VM isn't anywhere near
> ready for something that advanced.

Yeah, wouldn't that be nice.

Ok, so if we shouldn't touch the dma_map infrastructure how should the 
workaround to opt-out HFI and QIB look? I'm not that familiar with the 
RDMA code.

Thanks,

Logan