From: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
To: Guixin Liu <kanie@linux.alibaba.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, xlpang@linux.alibaba.com,
oliver.yang@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] nvme: add ABI documentation for host sysfs interfaces
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2026 19:19:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7d312569-a32d-4e08-bdfa-febb1389b83c@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260702095541.1145128-2-kanie@linux.alibaba.com>
On 7/2/26 3:25 PM, Guixin Liu wrote:
> +What: /sys/block/nvmeXnY/diag/command_retries_count
> +What: /sys/block/nvmeXnY/diag/command_error_count
> +What: /sys/block/nvmeXnY/diag/multipath_failover_count
> +What: /sys/block/nvmeXnY/diag/io_requeue_no_usable_path_count
> +What: /sys/block/nvmeXnY/diag/io_fail_no_available_path_count
> +Date: May 2026
> +KernelVersion: 7.2
> +Contact: Nilay Shroff<nilay@linux.ibm.com>
> +Description:
> + Namespace diagnostic counters.
> +
> + command_retries_count: I/O command retry counter. Only
> + visible on per-path devices.
> +
> + command_error_count: I/O command error counter. Only
> + visible on per-path devices.
> +
> + multipath_failover_count: Multipath failover counter.
> + Only visible on per-path devices. Requires
> + CONFIG_NVME_MULTIPATH.
> +
> + io_requeue_no_usable_path_count: Counter of I/Os requeued
> + because no usable path was available. Only visible on
> + multipath head devices. Requires CONFIG_NVME_MULTIPATH.
> +
> + io_fail_no_available_path_count: Counter of I/Os failed
> + because no available path existed. Only visible on
> + multipath head devices. Requires CONFIG_NVME_MULTIPATH.
> +
> + All counters can be reset by writing a value.
> +
How about splitting the above diagnostic counters into two sections instead? Since the sysfs
layout differs depending on whether multipath is enabled, I think documenting them separately
may make the interface clearer.
For instance, how about documenting it as follows:
One block covering non-multipath configurations:
What: /sys/block/nvmeXnY/diag/command_retries_count
What: /sys/block/nvmeXnY/diag/command_error_count
Description:
Namespace diagnostic counters for non-multipath
configurations (when CONFIG_NVME_MULTIPATH is
not configured).
command_retries_count: I/O command retry counter.
command_error_count: I/O command error counter.
All counters can be reset by writing any value.
For multipath configurations:
What: /sys/block/nvmeXcYnZ/diag/command_retries_count
What: /sys/block/nvmeXcYnZ/diag/command_error_count
What: /sys/block/nvmeXcYnZ/diag/multipath_failover_count
What: /sys/block/nvmeXnY/diag/io_requeue_no_usable_path_count
What: /sys/block/nvmeXnY/diag/io_fail_no_available_path_count
Description:
Namespace diagnostic counters for multipath
configurations (when CONFIG_NVME_MULTIPATH is
configured).
command_retries_count: I/O command retry counter.
command_error_count: I/O command error counter.
multipath_failover_count: Multipath failover counter.
io_requeue_no_usable_path_count: Counter of I/Os
requeued because no usable path was available.
io_fail_no_available_path_count: Counter of I/Os
failed because no available path existed.
All counters can be reset by writing any value.
I think this better reflects the actual sysfs interface and makes it immediately obvious where each
attribute is exposed, without having to describe the differences between per-path and multipath head
devices in the individual attribute descriptions.
One other suggestion: could we keep all of the diagnostic counters grouped together in the ABI
documentation? I noticed that in your first revision they were all documented together, but in
this revision they're separated. I'm referring to the controller diagnostic counters under:
/sys/class/nvme/nvmeX/diag/*
IMO, keeping all of the diagnostic counters adjacent would make the documentation easier to
browse.
And yes thanks for documenting all this!
--Nilay
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-02 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-02 9:55 [PATCH v2 0/3] nvme: add ABI documentation for sysfs and configfs interfaces Guixin Liu
2026-07-02 9:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] nvme: add ABI documentation for host sysfs interfaces Guixin Liu
2026-07-02 13:49 ` Nilay Shroff [this message]
2026-07-03 2:09 ` Guixin Liu
2026-07-03 6:32 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-07-02 9:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] nvmet: add ABI documentation for target configfs interfaces Guixin Liu
2026-07-03 6:34 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-07-02 9:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] MAINTAINERS: add missing NVMe documentation files Guixin Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7d312569-a32d-4e08-bdfa-febb1389b83c@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dwagner@suse.de \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=kanie@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=oliver.yang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=xlpang@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox