From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0415DD6395B for ; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 14:09:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=1GuDeFUj6LqwrNYgCSdn4xFiJPa0CXZ9bYmm3HhkVBE=; b=c+8lVHKBvtSDyyeW0gCY0WlPny symzUqO/Qux/D5T38tWjbrTCrGK/NzMBjHZ9XVZgFgdVg08xNrdtdoeA+Zkw2G/esf3laT+nP1K5U FeASW0PRIYod/o6+fxj8WcA38wPuQC9MT8IBKKbpJfF1OqW3BC2hguPDN182YFYf66Vj9qa1ijxYB wpA3U32qWde4G1JoYx2QFV1DgD+Am9Ecw02O7uEBjjBLrmMdYFFZqbXMgBXTjMPUIG6f8rwJgklG7 yIDQwUFyc2yNQHg4dR210h0gAS+aGX7bFUrTM/vhjWl5yy2twt2J+yuRzg0icQYvGfS4zLl09Wk6z StVwcy+A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tDlOT-0000000FUgd-0O6v; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 14:09:21 +0000 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tDlMI-0000000FUAP-3uSh for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 14:07:08 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (m0353725.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 4AK7lm3g002773; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 14:07:03 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to; s=pp1; bh=1GuDeF Uj6LqwrNYgCSdn4xFiJPa0CXZ9bYmm3HhkVBE=; b=OWEGsKqnDiW7wXpc6UWAUH TgUeHP8N5xmqlhtvNfforfRljWbSrnIZzvm1Unl8AG6JbaOg4Vq9COVxh1wdKs0P E0QTrfVjuW2LnKOH2Hj1omdWMmL7Lf+Y75dEFNNWobg65KUvdTnOucCz4CUzOF4K Ikjlljap9WbSYJtC7q3HugcxEUOPJ9mHyw+spGzdDh8kjyHIjJ8tyZCS6X+Q/biH THtvW/ulbX+lW6tmUX6XDgdbYAoRRyMVokmt+c9wlpxdYjsQn2ew8Jealtj8jRXg tUXKFIF2u8uJ4P7fKqITvmcs5zqc5/5so57YXzADGU1CR5hzGp/ce8FTDN6rw0Bg == Received: from ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5d.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.93]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 42xhtjw88p-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 20 Nov 2024 14:07:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 4AKDSLKN000576; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 14:07:02 GMT Received: from smtprelay02.dal12v.mail.ibm.com ([172.16.1.4]) by ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 42y77mbg24-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 20 Nov 2024 14:07:02 +0000 Received: from smtpav04.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav04.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [10.241.53.103]) by smtprelay02.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 4AKE71GX56230284 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 20 Nov 2024 14:07:01 GMT Received: from smtpav04.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E4F05805E; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 14:07:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav04.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B27875805A; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 14:06:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.109.198.240] (unknown [9.109.198.240]) by smtpav04.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 14:06:59 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <7f35cbe9-9e12-498b-b46a-be1f570772fc@linux.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 19:36:58 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [bug report][regression] blktests nvme/029 failed on latest linux-block/for-next To: Yi Zhang , "open list:NVM EXPRESS DRIVER" , linux-block Cc: Keith Busch , Shinichiro Kawasaki References: Content-Language: en-US From: Nilay Shroff In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: rU-Xj3lsQs21YkDwzdMlCRvWdMKZNC-i X-Proofpoint-GUID: rU-Xj3lsQs21YkDwzdMlCRvWdMKZNC-i X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1051,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.62.30 definitions=2024-10-15_01,2024-10-11_01,2024-09-30_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1011 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2409260000 definitions=main-2411200092 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20241120_060707_117869_82D30550 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.82 ) X-BeenThere: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-nvme" Errors-To: linux-nvme-bounces+linux-nvme=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 11/19/24 16:34, Yi Zhang wrote: > Hello > > CKI recently reported the blktests nvme/029 failed[1] on the > linux-block/for-next, and bisect shows it was introduced from [2], > please help check it and let me know if you need any info/test for it, thanks. > > [1] > nvme/029 (tr=loop) (test userspace IO via nvme-cli read/write > interface) [failed] > runtime ... 1.568s > --- tests/nvme/029.out 2024-11-19 08:13:41.379272231 +0000 > +++ /root/blktests/results/nodev_tr_loop/nvme/029.out.bad > 2024-11-19 10:55:13.615939542 +0000 > @@ -1,2 +1,8 @@ > Running nvme/029 > +FAIL > +FAIL > +FAIL > +FAIL > +FAIL > +FAIL > ... > (Run 'diff -u tests/nvme/029.out > /root/blktests/results/nodev_tr_loop/nvme/029.out.bad' to see the > entire diff) > [2] > 64a51080eaba (HEAD) nvmet: implement id ns for nvm command set > > > -- > Best Regards, > Yi Zhang > > I couldn't reproduce it even after running nvme/029 in a loop for multiple times. Are you following any specific steps to recreate it? Thanks, --Nilay